-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.5k
fix(gemini): handle 'minimal' reasoning_effort param for gemini-3.1-f… #22920
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Sameerlite
merged 1 commit into
BerriAI:main
from
Varad2001:litellm_gemini_3.1_reasoning_effort
Mar 6, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hardcoded model-name strings for feature detection
The
is_gemini3flashflag is determined by checking for hardcoded substring patterns ("gemini-3-flash","gemini-3.1-flash"). According to the project's custom rule, model-specific feature flags should not be hardcoded in the source; they should instead be driven by a field inmodel_prices_and_context_window.jsonread viaget_model_info. With the current approach, every new Gemini flash model that supports the"minimal"thinking level (e.g. a hypotheticalgemini-3.2-flash) requires another code change and a new LiteLLM release, rather than a simple JSON update.The same anti-pattern already exists in
_map_reasoning_effort_to_thinking_budget(lines ~745-754), but this PR extends it further. The suggested approach would be to add a flag such assupports_minimal_thinking_levelto each relevant model entry inmodel_prices_and_context_window.jsonand then check that flag here, similar to howsupports_reasoningis used elsewhere in the codebase.Context Used: Rule from
dashboard- What: Do not hardcode model-specific flags in the codebase. Instead, put them in model_prices_and_co... (source)