[Chore] Update aiml model pricing

[Sameerlite]

Relevant issues

Prices of aiml were updated: https://aimlapi.com/ai-ml-api-pricing

Pre-Submission checklist

Please complete all items before asking a LiteLLM maintainer to review your PR

• I have Added testing in the tests/litellm/ directory, Adding at least 1 test is a hard requirement - see details
• My PR passes all unit tests on make test-unit
• My PR's scope is as isolated as possible, it only solves 1 specific problem
• I have requested a Greptile review by commenting @greptileai and received a Confidence Score of at least 4/5 before requesting a maintainer review

CI (LiteLLM team)

CI status guideline:

• 50-55 passing tests: main is stable with minor issues.
• 45-49 passing tests: acceptable but needs attention
• <= 40 passing tests: unstable; be careful with your merges and assess the risk.

• Branch creation CI run
  Link:

• CI run for the last commit
  Link:

• Merge / cherry-pick CI run
  Links:

Type

🆕 New Feature
🐛 Bug Fix
🧹 Refactoring
📖 Documentation
🚄 Infrastructure
✅ Test

Changes

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
litellm	Building	Preview, Comment	Feb 26, 2026 3:24am

[greptile-apps]

Greptile Summary

Updates output_cost_per_image pricing for 11 AIML image generation models across both model_prices_and_context_window.json and its backup file. All changes are price increases (~24% on average). Both files remain in sync and valid JSON.

• Updated pricing for DALL-E 2, DALL-E 3, Flux Pro, Flux Dev, Flux Schnell, Flux Realism, Flux Kontext Max/Pro, Imagen 4.0 Ultra, and Nano Banana Pro
• aiml/flux-pro/v1.1-ultra is the only AIML image model not updated — may be an oversight
• No code logic changes; data-only PR

Confidence Score: 4/5

• This PR is safe to merge — it only updates pricing values in JSON config files with no code logic changes.
• Data-only changes to pricing JSON files. Both files stay in sync. One model (aiml/flux-pro/v1.1-ultra) may have been unintentionally skipped, but this is not a breaking issue.
• Verify that aiml/flux-pro/v1.1-ultra in model_prices_and_context_window.json (line 184) was intentionally left unchanged.

Important Files Changed

Filename	Overview
model_prices_and_context_window.json	Updated output_cost_per_image for 11 AIML image generation models. One model (aiml/flux-pro/v1.1-ultra) may have been missed.
litellm/model_prices_and_context_window_backup.json	Backup copy, identical changes to the main pricing file. Both files remain in sync.

Flowchart

%%{init: {'theme': 'neutral'}}%%
flowchart TD
    A[AIML Pricing Update PR] --> B[model_prices_and_context_window.json]
    A --> C[litellm/model_prices_and_context_window_backup.json]
    B --> D[11 Image Models Updated]
    C --> E[11 Image Models Updated - Identical]
    D --> F[dall-e-2: $0.021 → $0.026]
    D --> G[dall-e-3: $0.042 → $0.052]
    D --> H[flux-pro: $0.053 → $0.065]
    D --> I[flux-pro/v1.1: $0.042 → $0.052]
    D --> J[flux-realism: $0.037 → $0.046]
    D --> K[flux/dev: $0.026 → $0.033]
    D --> L[flux/schnell: $0.003 → $0.004]
    D --> M[kontext-max: $0.084 → $0.104]
    D --> N[kontext-pro: $0.042 → $0.052]
    D --> O[imagen-4.0-ultra: $0.063 → $0.078]
    D --> P[nano-banana-pro: $0.1575 → $0.195]
    style A fill:#4CAF50,color:white

Loading

_{Last reviewed commit: c845bdc}

[greptile-apps]

_{2 files reviewed, 1 comment}

_{Edit Code Review Agent Settings | Greptile}

[greptile-apps]

Additional Comments (1)

model_prices_and_context_window.json
Possible missed pricing update

aiml/flux-pro/v1.1-ultra is the only AIML image generation model whose output_cost_per_image was not updated in this PR. All other 11 AIML image models received price increases (~24% on average). Was this intentionally left unchanged, or is this an oversight?