Skip to content

docs: add Semgrep & OOM fixes section to v1.81.12 release notes#21334

Merged
AlexsanderHamir merged 1 commit intomainfrom
litellm_release_notes_000001
Feb 16, 2026
Merged

docs: add Semgrep & OOM fixes section to v1.81.12 release notes#21334
AlexsanderHamir merged 1 commit intomainfrom
litellm_release_notes_000001

Conversation

@AlexsanderHamir
Copy link
Contributor

Relevant issues

Pre-Submission checklist

Please complete all items before asking a LiteLLM maintainer to review your PR

  • I have Added testing in the tests/litellm/ directory, Adding at least 1 test is a hard requirement - see details
  • My PR passes all unit tests on make test-unit
  • My PR's scope is as isolated as possible, it only solves 1 specific problem
  • I have requested a Greptile review by commenting @greptileai and received a Confidence Score of at least 4/5 before requesting a maintainer review

CI (LiteLLM team)

CI status guideline:

  • 50-55 passing tests: main is stable with minor issues.
  • 45-49 passing tests: acceptable but needs attention
  • <= 40 passing tests: unstable; be careful with your merges and assess the risk.
  • Branch creation CI run
    Link:

  • CI run for the last commit
    Link:

  • Merge / cherry-pick CI run
    Links:

Type

🆕 New Feature
🐛 Bug Fix
🧹 Refactoring
📖 Documentation
🚄 Infrastructure
✅ Test

Changes

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 16, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
litellm Building Building Preview, Comment Feb 16, 2026 7:40pm

Request Review

@AlexsanderHamir AlexsanderHamir merged commit a5e8eb6 into main Feb 16, 2026
12 of 69 checks passed
@greptile-apps
Copy link
Contributor

greptile-apps bot commented Feb 16, 2026

Greptile Summary

Documentation-only change that adds a new "Add Semgrep & fix OOMs" entry to the v1.81.12 release notes. The PR adds a bullet point in the Key Highlights section and a dedicated subsection describing the out-of-memory fixes (bounded asyncio.Queue() with configurable LITELLM_ASYNCIO_QUEUE_MAXSIZE) and the new Semgrep rule for detecting unbounded-memory patterns. References PR #20912.

  • Adds highlight bullet linking to the new dedicated section and the original PR
  • Adds a ## Add Semgrep & fix OOMs section with a clear description of the OOM fix and Semgrep rule
  • PR Add semgrep & Fix OOMs #20912 is also already referenced under the "Performance / Loadbalancing / Reliability improvements" section, so this promotes the change to Key Highlights for greater visibility

Confidence Score: 5/5

  • This is a minimal documentation-only change to release notes with no code changes — safe to merge.
  • The PR modifies a single documentation file (release notes), adding well-formatted content that is consistent with the existing document structure. There are no code changes, no test requirements, and no risk of runtime impact.
  • No files require special attention.

Important Files Changed

Filename Overview
docs/my-website/release_notes/v1.81.12.md Adds a new "Semgrep & fix OOMs" entry to Key Highlights and a dedicated section describing the OOM fix and Semgrep rule addition from PR #20912. No issues found.

Flowchart

flowchart TD
    A["v1.81.12 Release Notes"] --> B["Key Highlights Section"]
    A --> C["Performance Section"]
    B --> D["NEW: Add Semgrep & fix OOMs bullet"]
    D --> E["Links to dedicated section"]
    D --> F["Links to PR #20912"]
    A --> G["NEW: Add Semgrep & fix OOMs Section"]
    G --> H["Bounded asyncio.Queue with\nLITELLM_ASYNCIO_QUEUE_MAXSIZE"]
    G --> I["Semgrep rule for\nunbounded-memory patterns"]
    C --> J["Existing PR #20912 reference"]
Loading

Last reviewed commit: 3f6a8c5

Copy link
Contributor

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1 file reviewed, no comments

Edit Code Review Agent Settings | Greptile

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant