fix WeldxFile doctest for asdf 3.0

[braingram]

Changes

As mentioned in #903

A doctest is failing due to changes in asdf 3.0 (including removal of BuiltinExtension) that result in slight and otherwise inconsequential header differences.

This PR expands the use of ... in the doctest to allow the text matching to ignore these header differences.

Checks

• updated CHANGELOG.md
• updated tests/
• updated doc/
• update example/tutorial notebooks
• update manifest file

[github-actions]

Test Results

2 188 tests  ±0   2 187 ✅ +1   2m 3s ⏱️ ±0s
    1 suites ±0       1 💤 ±0 
    1 files   ±0       0 ❌  - 1 

Results for commit da10598. ± Comparison against base commit bb213a7.

[marscher]

LGTM as well. I do not get, why the notebook tests for Python 3.10 fail with an ImportError for WeldxFile.

[braingram]

That one is kind of puzzling.

I do see an error related to "quality_standard_demo":
https://github.com/BAMWelDX/weldx/actions/runs/7398732873/job/20179218430?pr=904#step:12:82

File ~/work/weldx/weldx/quality_standard_demo/src/quality_standard_demo/__init__.py:1
----> 1 from ._version import __version__

ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'quality_standard_demo._version'

It looks like the cookiecutter template here: https://github.com/BAMWelDX/quality-standard-template
is rendered and installed:

weldx/.github/workflows/pytest.yml

Line 78 in bb213a7

cookiecutter --no-input https://github.com/BAMWeldx/quality-standard-template

but is lacking a _version file (perhaps something has changed in setuptools-scm that it's no longer generating a _version.py?).
The missing file appears to be preventing correct entry point loading for weldx which then leads to the ImportError for weldx.

[CagtayFabry]

Thank you for the fix @braingram !

I haven't had time yet to look into the issue regarding the quality standard template I will try to follow up with what you already found

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (c94b182) 96.46% compared to head (da10598) 96.45%.
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #904      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.46%   96.45%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          95       95              
  Lines        6287     6287              
==========================================
- Hits         6065     6064       -1     
- Misses        222      223       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[CagtayFabry]

I have updated the outdated build chain causing the issues BAMWelDX/quality-standard-template#20

Thanks again @braingram