Skip to content

Conversation

@wanlwanl
Copy link
Contributor

@wanlwanl wanlwanl commented Aug 13, 2024

Copy link
Member

@MaryGao MaryGao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left small comments!

Regarding the customization code I remember Ray has mentioned we could improve our automation to have message like The SDK has customized SDK code and might not be compatible with the new specs, the service team may need to update the customized code or the new specs. Not sure this is feasible and we have plan for this.

@wanlwanl
Copy link
Contributor Author

Left small comments!

Regarding the customization code I remember Ray has mentioned we could improve our automation to have message like The SDK has customized SDK code and might not be compatible with the new specs, the service team may need to update the customized code or the new specs. Not sure this is feasible and we have plan for this.

The current customized code is mixed in generated code, we don't know if customer has customized code. I think it's better to seperate generated code and customized code in the future.

@wanlwanl wanlwanl merged commit 7bd7a29 into main Aug 13, 2024
@wanlwanl wanlwanl deleted the wanl/delete-before-gencode branch August 13, 2024 08:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[SDK Automation - JS] Support SDK generation in CI pipeline for the services migrated from Swagger to TypeSpec

3 participants