Skip to content

Sync eng/common directory with azure-sdk-tools for PR 13218#3425

Merged
azure-sdk merged 3 commits intomainfrom
sync-eng/common-eval-tool-desc-script-13218
Dec 11, 2025
Merged

Sync eng/common directory with azure-sdk-tools for PR 13218#3425
azure-sdk merged 3 commits intomainfrom
sync-eng/common-eval-tool-desc-script-13218

Conversation

@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

Sync eng/common directory with azure-sdk-tools for PR Azure/azure-sdk-tools#13218 See eng/common workflow

@azure-sdk azure-sdk requested a review from a team as a code owner December 11, 2025 00:42
@azure-sdk azure-sdk requested review from Copilot and smw-ms December 11, 2025 00:42
@azure-sdk azure-sdk added EngSys This issue is impacting the engineering system. Central-EngSys This issue is owned by the Engineering System team. labels Dec 11, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR syncs the eng/common directory with azure-sdk-tools repository (PR #13218), introducing a new PowerShell automation script for evaluating tool and prompt descriptions using the Tool Description Evaluator from the MCP repository.

Key Changes:

  • Adds a new PowerShell script that builds and runs a .NET evaluator tool
  • Implements parameter validation, environment variable management, and file operations
  • Provides comprehensive documentation with examples for invoking the evaluator

@azure-sdk azure-sdk merged commit 96834b3 into main Dec 11, 2025
28 checks passed
@azure-sdk azure-sdk deleted the sync-eng/common-eval-tool-desc-script-13218 branch December 11, 2025 19:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Central-EngSys This issue is owned by the Engineering System team. EngSys This issue is impacting the engineering system.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants