[AutoPR] containerregistry/resource-manager

[AutorestCI]

Created to accumulate context: containerregistry/resource-manager

[AutorestCI]

(message created by the CI based on PR content)

Installation instruction

Package azure-mgmt-containerregistry

You can install the package azure-mgmt-containerregistry of this PR using the following command:
pip install "git+https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-python@restapi_auto_containerregistry/resource-manager#egg=azure-mgmt-containerregistry&subdirectory=azure-mgmt-containerregistry"

You can build a wheel to distribute for test using the following command:
pip wheel --no-deps "git+https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-python@restapi_auto_containerregistry/resource-manager#egg=azure-mgmt-containerregistry&subdirectory=azure-mgmt-containerregistry"

If you have a local clone of this repository, you can also do:

• git checkout restapi_auto_containerregistry/resource-manager
• pip install -e ./azure-mgmt-containerregistry

Or build a wheel file to distribute for testing:

• git checkout restapi_auto_containerregistry/resource-manager
• pip wheel --no-deps ./azure-mgmt-containerregistry

Direct download

Your files can be directly downloaded here:

• azure-mgmt-containerregistry-3.0.0rc5.zip
• azure_mgmt_containerregistry-3.0.0rc5-py2.py3-none-any.whl

[ankurkhemani]

@zikalino 3.0.0rc4 is already released. Not sure why PR generates that whl.
Can you please help me merge this multi-api python sdk and release it to PyPI?
// cc @lmazuel

[zikalino]

@ankurkhemani when I verify and change version it will generate proper version and then it will be released with right version number. I will handle this today.

[ankurkhemani]

@zikalino Did you get a chance to work on this?

[zikalino]

@ankurkhemani I am ready to release package, just would like to learn what was the idea behind changing api version earlier and now reverting it back.

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #6543 into master will increase coverage by 8%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6543       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   48.94%   56.95%       +8%     
===========================================
  Files        7304       71     -7233     
  Lines      294242     8140   -286102     
===========================================
- Hits       144019     4636   -139383     
+ Misses     150223     3504   -146719

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...rregistry/_container_registry_management_client.py	42.1% <100%> (+2.33%)	⬆️
...erregistry/azure/mgmt/containerregistry/version.py	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
...v2017_10_01/operations/_replications_operations.py	14.76% <0%> (-77.19%)	⬇️
...try/v2017_10_01/operations/_webhooks_operations.py	13.27% <0%> (-72.04%)	⬇️
...y/v2017_10_01/operations/_registries_operations.py	12.12% <0%> (-56.67%)	⬇️
sdk/core/azure-common/azure/common/__init__.py	54.54% <0%> (-45.46%)	⬇️
...mt/containerregistry/v2017_10_01/models/_models.py	50.78% <0%> (-19.75%)	⬇️
...ontainerregistry/v2017_10_01/models/_models_py3.py	50.78% <0%> (-19.75%)	⬇️
...tainerregistry/v2017_10_01/models/_paged_models.py	76.19% <0%> (-19.05%)	⬇️
sdk/core/azure-common/azure/profiles/__init__.py	69.76% <0%> (-16.28%)	⬇️
... and 7269 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 379c1a1...b7e7ab6. Read the comment docs.

[zikalino]

@ankurkhemani
seems like there are test failures, and i need to re-record them.
just wonder how it was passing before....

[ankurkhemani]

@zikalino Not sure about the tests here. @lmazuel ?