Skip to content

Conversation

@AutorestCI
Copy link
Contributor

Created to accumulate context: storage/resource-manager

@AutorestCI
Copy link
Contributor Author

AutorestCI commented May 28, 2018

(message created by the CI based on PR content)

Installation instruction

Package azure-mgmt-storage

You can install the package azure-mgmt-storage of this PR using the following command:
pip install "git+https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-python@restapi_auto_storage/resource-manager#egg=azure-mgmt-storage&subdirectory=azure-mgmt-storage"

You can build a wheel to distribute for test using the following command:
pip wheel --no-deps "git+https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-python@restapi_auto_storage/resource-manager#egg=azure-mgmt-storage&subdirectory=azure-mgmt-storage"

If you have a local clone of this repository, you can also do:

  • git checkout restapi_auto_storage/resource-manager
  • pip install -e ./azure-mgmt-storage

Or build a wheel file to distribute for testing:

  • git checkout restapi_auto_storage/resource-manager
  • pip wheel --no-deps ./azure-mgmt-storage

Direct download

Your files can be directly downloaded here:

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented May 28, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #2642 into master will decrease coverage by 0.09%.
The diff coverage is 11.11%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master    #2642     +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage   55.89%   55.79%   -0.1%     
=========================================
  Files        7139     7161     +22     
  Lines      150351   151154    +803     
=========================================
+ Hits        84036    84335    +299     
- Misses      66315    66819    +504
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
azure-mgmt-storage/azure/mgmt/storage/version.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
...ge/azure/mgmt/storage/storage_management_client.py 50% <5.88%> (-7.01%) ⬇️
...ermanager/models/power_shell_command_parameters.py 66.66% <0%> (-13.34%) ⬇️
...er/models/power_shell_tab_completion_parameters.py 66.66% <0%> (-13.34%) ⬇️
...nager/models/power_shell_tab_completion_results.py 66.66% <0%> (-13.34%) ⬇️
...mt/servermanager/models/prompt_message_response.py 66.66% <0%> (-13.34%) ⬇️
...vermanager/models/power_shell_session_resources.py 57.14% <0%> (-9.53%) ⬇️
...mt/servermanager/models/encryption_jwk_resource.py 44.44% <0%> (-5.56%) ⬇️
...ervermanager/models/power_shell_command_results.py 44.44% <0%> (-5.56%) ⬇️
...re/mgmt/servermanager/models/session_parameters.py 40% <0%> (-4.45%) ⬇️
... and 38 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 559aecd...1c20f10. Read the comment docs.

return OperationClass(self._client, self.config, Serializer(self._models_dict(api_version)), Deserializer(self._models_dict(api_version)))

@property
def usages(self):
Copy link
Contributor

@williexu williexu May 29, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why does this new api version have usages instead of usage?
Is this a spelling mistake or is this a conscious change?

Doesn't seem to be a very useful change.

@lmazuel lmazuel merged commit f5f8a04 into master May 30, 2018
@lmazuel lmazuel deleted the restapi_auto_storage/resource-manager branch May 30, 2018 16:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants