Skip to content

[AutoPR keyvault/resource-manager]#1923

Closed
lmazuel wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
restapi_auto_keyvault/resource-manager
Closed

[AutoPR keyvault/resource-manager]#1923
lmazuel wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
restapi_auto_keyvault/resource-manager

Conversation

@lmazuel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@lmazuel lmazuel commented Feb 7, 2018

@schaabs The new automation system now groups automatically by context. This means each time a Swagger change to ARM KV is made, this goes here, and not to yet another PR. This should simplify your review system. You can even take this branch as your ARM preview if you like.
Thoughts?

Mark vault creation as a long running operation
@schaabs
Copy link
Copy Markdown

schaabs commented Feb 7, 2018

@lmazuel I really like this flow. It definitely will reduce some of the noise and confusion when you have multiple changes and several pending PRs at the same time. As to using this branch for our azure-mgmt-keyvault preview, I will probably merge these changes into our keyvault_1.0_preview branch and publish previews for both our packages from this branch. This is easier as it allows me to have both preview packages installed through dev_setup and they can both be tested together. Thoughts?

@lmazuel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

lmazuel commented Feb 7, 2018

@schaabs LGTM. I think we should close this PR and delete the branch when you will release a new ARM package from your preview branch (or from master). A new PR with a fresh branch will be re-created anyway the next time you touch the ARM Swaggers files, and this ensure the branch is still in sync.

adding storage permissions for soft delete and backup restore
@schaabs
Copy link
Copy Markdown

schaabs commented Feb 8, 2018

Closing this pull request. Will update fix the tests in this branch then open a pull request from this branch into keyvault_1.0_preview

@schaabs schaabs closed this Feb 8, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants