[SQL] Automatic PR from RestAPI-PR1127

[AutorestCI]

Generated from RestAPI PR: Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#1127

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #1091 into master will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 54.23%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1091      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   56.55%   56.56%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        2024     2029       +5     
  Lines       56953    57003      +50     
==========================================
+ Hits        32209    32243      +34     
- Misses      24744    24760      +16

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...mt-sql/azure/mgmt/sql/models/edition_capability.py	62.5% <ø> (ø)	⬆️
...re/mgmt/sql/models/service_objective_capability.py	41.66% <0%> (-3.79%)	⬇️
...azure/mgmt/sql/models/server_version_capability.py	55.55% <0%> (-6.95%)	⬇️
...e-mgmt-sql/azure/mgmt/sql/sql_management_client.py	100% <100%> (+26.66%)	⬆️
...ure-mgmt-sql/azure/mgmt/sql/operations/__init__.py	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
azure-mgmt-sql/azure/mgmt/sql/models/__init__.py	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
...ure/mgmt/sql/models/sql_management_client_enums.py	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
azure-mgmt-sql/azure/mgmt/sql/version.py	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
.../azure/mgmt/sql/operations/databases_operations.py	24.37% <4.34%> (ø)	⬆️
...ure/mgmt/sql/models/elastic_pool_dtu_capability.py	41.66% <41.66%> (ø)
... and 9 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 586f19d...79d6c9f. Read the comment docs.

[jaredmoo]

@nathannfan FYI

@lmazuel , can you merge and publish:

Breaking changes:

SqlManagementClient.list_operations is now SqlManagementClient.operations.list

New features

Added elastic pool capabilities to capabilities API.

[lmazuel]

Hi @jaredmoo

I saw a looooot of PRs since the last time I released, like, #1080 #1065 #1070 #1058 #1059. Could you just confirm this little ChangeLog is ok for all these changes? (just a quick look ot the diff files should be enough).

Thanks!

[jaredmoo]

Yes this changelog is fine. #1070 is the operations change. #1058 , #1065, and #1080 were essentially reverted because we removed the new apis from composite sql. #1059 is just #1058 plus a very minor change that doesn't need changelog. Thanks for checking!