Skip to content

[Event Hubs] Connection Idle Timeout Option#22677

Merged
jsquire merged 1 commit intoAzure:mainfrom
jsquire:eventhubs/idle-timeout
Jul 16, 2021
Merged

[Event Hubs] Connection Idle Timeout Option#22677
jsquire merged 1 commit intoAzure:mainfrom
jsquire:eventhubs/idle-timeout

Conversation

@jsquire
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jsquire jsquire commented Jul 15, 2021

Summary

The focus of these changes is to allow the idle timeout applied to connections be specified as part of the options for each client.

References and Related

@jsquire jsquire added Event Hubs Client This issue is related to a non-management package labels Jul 15, 2021
@jsquire jsquire added this to the [2021] August milestone Jul 15, 2021
@jsquire jsquire self-assigned this Jul 15, 2021
@jsquire
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

jsquire commented Jul 15, 2021

Fixes #22674

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this line break need a <para tag, or will it be automatically preserved by the docs processing?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some really awesome human fixed the doc transform tools so that a blank line between two lines of text will automatically break into paragraphs. 😄

The focus of these changes is to allow the idle timeout applied to
connections be specified as part of the options for each client.
@jsquire jsquire force-pushed the eventhubs/idle-timeout branch from 1017ccd to 3b4ae4e Compare July 16, 2021 15:14
@jsquire jsquire merged commit d952afd into Azure:main Jul 16, 2021
@jsquire jsquire deleted the eventhubs/idle-timeout branch July 16, 2021 16:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Client This issue is related to a non-management package Event Hubs

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants