Use dedicated agent pool for storage live tests#20037
Conversation
|
/azp run net - storage - tests |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
3a42267 to
8afb11d
Compare
|
/azp run net - storage - tests |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
8afb11d to
fd5d731
Compare
|
/azp run net - storage - tests |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/azp run net - storage - tests |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
fd5d731 to
c17417d
Compare
|
/azp run net - storage - tests |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
weshaggard
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The change looks good. We should get confirmation from the storage team.
|
@kasobol-msft can you have a look to see if test runs look correct with these new pools? |
|
/azp run net - storage - tests |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/azp run net - storage - ci |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
@weshaggard @benbp This doesn't look good https://dev.azure.com/azure-sdk/internal/_build/results?buildId=837569&view=ms.vss-test-web.build-test-results-tab&runId=18242910&resultId=100885&paneView=debug . I was looking at logs and it seems that agent size is correct (D4ds_v4). However .net fx tests are failing with oom which isn't the case for other .net distros. Is it possible that it runs 32 bit process ? what's the command to run net461 tests ? (the log says it's some temp psh...) |
|
I think I'll take that investigation outside of this PR. Either we figure out why net461 doesn't like these tests or we'll find a way to not run them on net461. #20301 |
|
@kasobol-msft was your intention that I should merge this and you'll address the failures, or we should keep this open? |
|
please go ahead and merge. |
|
/check-enforcer override |
This PR cuts over the storage pipelines to use a dedicated storage pool that has been provisioned in Central Canada which has more memory for their specialized test scenarios.
This PR is a replacement for #19191