Skip to content

[AutoPR @azure/arm-apimanagement] fix: apimanagment model validation#4433

Merged
openapi-sdkautomation[bot] merged 1 commit intoAzure:sdkAutomation/@azure/arm-apimanagementfrom
AzureSDKAutomation:sdkAutomation/@azure/arm-apimanagement@6725
Jul 30, 2019
Merged

[AutoPR @azure/arm-apimanagement] fix: apimanagment model validation#4433
openapi-sdkautomation[bot] merged 1 commit intoAzure:sdkAutomation/@azure/arm-apimanagementfrom
AzureSDKAutomation:sdkAutomation/@azure/arm-apimanagement@6725

Conversation

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link
Contributor

fix: apimanagment model validation

- Add missing "body" in response
Didn't add "body" for some "202" with no schemas, but maybe they should be empty.
@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link
Contributor Author

Installation Instructions

You can install the package @azure/arm-apimanagement of this PR using the following command:

npm install https://openapistorageprod.blob.core.windows.net/sdkautomation/prod/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/6725/2/Azure/azure-sdk-for-js/@azure/arm-apimanagement/azure-arm-apimanagement-5.1.0.tgz

Direct Download

The generated package can be directly downloaded from here:

@msftclas
Copy link

msftclas commented Jul 25, 2019

CLA assistant check
All CLA requirements met.

@ramya-rao-a
Copy link
Contributor

@daviwil Looks like this got generated using the new code generator which uses the new core libraries which shouldn't be used just yet...

@ramya-rao-a ramya-rao-a requested a review from daviwil July 26, 2019 15:09
Copy link
Contributor

@daviwil daviwil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs to be regenerated using autorest.typescript 4.1.1.

@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot merged commit 36593c8 into Azure:sdkAutomation/@azure/arm-apimanagement Jul 30, 2019
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot deleted the sdkAutomation/@azure/arm-apimanagement@6725 branch July 30, 2019 19:52
@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link
Contributor Author

Integration Pull Request: #4495

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants