[core-rest-pipeline] Fix issue with afterPhase policies getting run later than expected#22924
Merged
xirzec merged 1 commit intoAzure:mainfrom Aug 17, 2022
Merged
[core-rest-pipeline] Fix issue with afterPhase policies getting run later than expected#22924xirzec merged 1 commit intoAzure:mainfrom
xirzec merged 1 commit intoAzure:mainfrom
Conversation
ghost
added
the
Collaborator
|
API change check API changes are not detected in this pull request. |
joheredi
approved these changes
Aug 17, 2022
dgetu
approved these changes
Aug 17, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Packages impacted by this PR
@azure/core-rest-pipelineDescribe the problem that is addressed by this PR
Policies using 'afterPhase' would get executed later than expected due to
noPhasenot getting run again until the full phase walk finished.Are there test cases added in this PR?
Yes