Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@kpajdzik do you know why each management package has its own copy of the license file? There shouldn't be any reason we cannot share one for the entire repo.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think NPM is going to display correct license if it isn't shipped with the package.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't even know if the file is necessary for the standard licenses like MIT as the package.json simply has "license": "MIT", but the file does automatically get included in the package according to the spec https://docs.npmjs.com/files/package.json#files so if we did move it we would have to add an entry for it in our package.json manaully. For now lets leave it but it is something we should potentially clean-up at some point.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I filed issue #2150 to follow-up on this conversation.
33530d6 to
463daeb
Compare
Moving packages for arm-appservice from packages@Azure and putting them under an
sdkdirectory.A few changes that have been made:
The source code directory
libhas been renamed tosrcAll the links in various files referencing
libhave been updated tosrcThe paths of all the data-plane package under appservice service (@azure/arm-appservice) have been updated eg:
packages/@azure/arm-appserviceto the new structure pathsdk/appservice/arm-appserviceto follow the structure sdk/servicename/packagenameAll the corresponding links in different files like package.json, etc have also been updated for the new structure path
I have also updated the path in README.md (typescript) for azure-rest-api-specs.
Please review Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#5608
@salameer @daschult @kpajdzik @Azure/azure-sdk-eng