Skip to content

TestProxy with a switch to start#18466

Merged
HarshaNalluru merged 10 commits intoAzure:mainfrom
HarshaNalluru:harshan/issue/unleash-test-proxy
Nov 10, 2021
Merged

TestProxy with a switch to start#18466
HarshaNalluru merged 10 commits intoAzure:mainfrom
HarshaNalluru:harshan/issue/unleash-test-proxy

Conversation

@HarshaNalluru
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@HarshaNalluru HarshaNalluru commented Nov 1, 2021

Doing similar to what has been done in GO.

@HarshaNalluru HarshaNalluru changed the title TestProxy with a switch to start [In Progress] TestProxy with a switch to start Nov 1, 2021
@HarshaNalluru HarshaNalluru requested a review from scbedd November 1, 2021 20:16
@check-enforcer
Copy link
Copy Markdown

check-enforcer bot commented Nov 1, 2021

This pull request is protected by Check Enforcer.

What is Check Enforcer?

Check Enforcer helps ensure all pull requests are covered by at least one check-run (typically an Azure Pipeline). When all check-runs associated with this pull request pass then Check Enforcer itself will pass.

Why am I getting this message?

You are getting this message because Check Enforcer did not detect any check-runs being associated with this pull request within five minutes. This may indicate that your pull request is not covered by any pipelines and so Check Enforcer is correctly blocking the pull request being merged.

What should I do now?

If the check-enforcer check-run is not passing and all other check-runs associated with this PR are passing (excluding license-cla) then you could try telling Check Enforcer to evaluate your pull request again. You can do this by adding a comment to this pull request as follows:
/check-enforcer evaluate
Typically evaulation only takes a few seconds. If you know that your pull request is not covered by a pipeline and this is expected you can override Check Enforcer using the following command:
/check-enforcer override
Note that using the override command triggers alerts so that follow-up investigations can occur (PRs still need to be approved as normal).

What if I am onboarding a new service?

Often, new services do not have validation pipelines associated with them, in order to bootstrap pipelines for a new service, you can issue the following command as a pull request comment:
/azp run prepare-pipelines
This will run a pipeline that analyzes the source tree and creates the pipelines necessary to build and validate your pull request. Once the pipeline has been created you can trigger the pipeline using the following comment:
/azp run js - [service] - ci

Co-authored-by: Scott Beddall <45376673+scbedd@users.noreply.github.com>
- name: ServiceDirectory
type: string
default: not-specified
- name: TestProxy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

down below we call into ci.yml. We need to add additional parameter so the call looks like this:

      - template: /eng/pipelines/templates/jobs/ci.yml
        parameters:
          ServiceDirectory: ${{ parameters.ServiceDirectory }}
          TestProxy: ${{ parameterse.TestProxy }}
          Artifacts: ${{ parameters.Artifacts }}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Parameters are compile-time constants. So technically it'll work if we miss adding it to each level of templates, but it'll be super confusing to debug. Better to pass all the way through.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IN jobs/ci.yml, we need to add the parameter (and then pass it to ci.tests.yml -> tests.yml)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does it look good now?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes! At least, I think so :)

- name: ServiceDirectory
type: string
default: not-specified
- name: TestProxy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does it look good now?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah. seems reasonable. now let's see what breaks 👍

@HarshaNalluru
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Yayy! Running fine. 🎉
@scbedd @praveenkuttappan

@HarshaNalluru HarshaNalluru requested a review from scbedd November 1, 2021 22:30
Comment on lines +46 to +53
- ${{ if eq(parameters.TestProxy, true) }}:
- pwsh: |
# ambitious_azsdk_test_proxy is the hardcoded container name used
# by the test proxy startup script
docker logs ambitious_azsdk_test_proxy
displayName: 'Dump Test Proxy logs'
condition: succeededOrFailed()

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- ${{ if eq(parameters.TestProxy, true) }}:
- pwsh: |
# ambitious_azsdk_test_proxy is the hardcoded container name used
# by the test proxy startup script
docker logs ambitious_azsdk_test_proxy
displayName: 'Dump Test Proxy logs'
condition: succeededOrFailed()

Also removing this @scbedd

Do you have an alternative for this?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will. issue filed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@HarshaNalluru HarshaNalluru merged commit b1ae6ca into Azure:main Nov 10, 2021
@HarshaNalluru HarshaNalluru deleted the harshan/issue/unleash-test-proxy branch November 10, 2021 00:32
@HarshaNalluru HarshaNalluru changed the title [In Progress] TestProxy with a switch to start TestProxy with a switch to start Nov 11, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants