Service fabric e2e Identity tests#16187
Conversation
KarishmaGhiya
force-pushed
the
service-fabric
branch
from
b35496d to
70045c7
Compare
…ic/INSTRUCTIONS.md
|
|
||
| To use the provided templates: | ||
|
|
||
| 1. Open `arm-templates/sfmitestsystem.parameters.json` and complete the fields `clusterName`, `clusterLocation`, and `applicationPackageUrl`. `clusterName` and `clusterLocation` should match the name and location of your Service Fabric cluster. `applicationPackageUrl` is the URL of the `.sfpkg` you uploaded to a storage account in the previous step. To find the URL, click on `sfmitestsystem.sfpkg` in the Portal to view its properties. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I can’t find arm-templates/sfmitestsystem.parameters.json in this branch 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh so it’s the same arm-templates/cluster*?
|
|
||
| ``` | ||
| az deployment group create --resource-group $RESOURCE_GROUP --template-file arm-templates\sfmitestsystem.template.json --parameters arm-templates\sfmitestsystem.parameters.json | ||
| az deployment group create --resource-group $RESOURCE_GROUP --template-file arm-templates\sfmitestuser.template.json --parameters arm-templates\sfmitestuser.parameters.json |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If these two ARM templates don’t exist, and only the arm-templates/cluster* ones exist, these commands need to change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same with the similar pairs of commands below.
…ic/INSTRUCTIONS.md
ghost
added
the
no-recent-activity
|
Hi @KarishmaGhiya. Thank you for your interest in helping to improve the Azure SDK experience and for your contribution. We've noticed that there hasn't been recent engagement on this pull request. If this is still an active work stream, please let us know by pushing some changes or leaving a comment. Otherwise, we'll close this out in 7 days. |
ghost
closed this
|
Hi @KarishmaGhiya. Thank you for your contribution. Since there hasn't been recent engagement, we're going to close this out. Feel free to respond with a comment containing "/reopen" if you'd like to continue working on these changes. Please be sure to use the command to reopen or remove the "no-recent-activity" label; otherwise, this is likely to be closed again with the next cleanup pass. |
|
We'd like to keep this PR open till we get some more time to start working on this again. Need to reference both these - Azure/azure-sdk#901 (comment) and Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#21370 |
ghost
removed
the
no-recent-activity
ghost
added
the
no-recent-activity
|
Hi @KarishmaGhiya. Thank you for your interest in helping to improve the Azure SDK experience and for your contribution. We've noticed that there hasn't been recent engagement on this pull request. If this is still an active work stream, please let us know by pushing some changes or leaving a comment. Otherwise, we'll close this out in 7 days. |
ghost
closed this
|
Hi @KarishmaGhiya. Thank you for your contribution. Since there hasn't been recent engagement, we're going to close this out. Feel free to respond with a comment containing "/reopen" if you'd like to continue working on these changes. Please be sure to use the command to reopen or remove the "no-recent-activity" label; otherwise, this is likely to be closed again with the next cleanup pass. |
KarishmaGhiya
removed
the
no-recent-activity
ghost
added
the
no-recent-activity
|
Hi @KarishmaGhiya. Thank you for your interest in helping to improve the Azure SDK experience and for your contribution. We've noticed that there hasn't been recent engagement on this pull request. If this is still an active work stream, please let us know by pushing some changes or leaving a comment. Otherwise, we'll close this out in 7 days. |
ghost
closed this
|
Hi @KarishmaGhiya. Thank you for your contribution. Since there hasn't been recent engagement, we're going to close this out. Feel free to respond with a comment containing "/reopen" if you'd like to continue working on these changes. Please be sure to use the command to reopen or remove the "no-recent-activity" label; otherwise, this is likely to be closed again with the next cleanup pass. |
3 participants
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.