-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
Cosmos: clean test gates #6373
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cosmos: clean test gates #6373
Conversation
…t from Main.java, and attempted to address a memory leak in the RntbdRequestTimer
…ure-sdk-for-java into feature/cosmos/v4
…n long or int value should specify units
…_RESOLUTION_IN_NANOS from 5 to 100 ms in the hopes of resolving a performance issue on Windows
…d Mono.empty() and instead used ValueHolder<>(null)
…perations test failure which resulted from an incorrectly formed expected result string. Also: Removed unnecessary Ignore annotation imports.
…aThapar/azure-sdk-for-java into issue/#6289/cosmos/V4/assess-test-issues
…e might or might not keep the renames.
…ogs. We might or might not keep the renames.
…k-for-java into issue/#6289/cosmos/V4/assess-test-issues
|
/azp run java - cosmos - tests |
|
Pull request contains merge conflicts. |
|
/azp run java - cosmos - tests |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
…test because it is configured to use BoundedStaleness consistency.
… test timeout by bumping TIMEOUT as well as SETUP_TIMEOUT interval from 60 to 120 seconds
|
/azp run java - cosmos - tests |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
… test timeout on Emulator runs by moving the queryLargeDocuments test out of the emulator group into the simple group.
|
/azp run java - cosmos - tests |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/azp run java - cosmos - tests |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
…inely timeout during intialization on compute/memory constrained systems like CI
|
/azp run java - cosmos - tests |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
…yTest which itermittently times out in CI environments.
|
/azp run java - cosmos - tests |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
…egy for before_ParallelDocumentQueryTest which itermittently fails due to a 503 on a query operation in CI environments.
|
/azp run java - cosmos - tests |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
kushagraThapar
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
| /// <returns>List of effective partition key ranges for a collection or null if collection doesn't exist.</returns> | ||
| Mono<List<PartitionKeyRange>> tryGetOverlappingRangesAsync(String collectionResourceId, Range<String> range, | ||
| boolean forceRefresh /* = false */, Map<String, Object> properties); | ||
| Mono<Utils.ValueHolder<List<PartitionKeyRange>>> tryGetOverlappingRangesAsync(String collectionResourceId, Range<String> range, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This changes already are already merged:
#6312
Are there more changes? or the branch is stale? could you merge the source branch back to your branch
|
|
||
| @BeforeClass(groups = { "simple" }, timeOut = SETUP_TIMEOUT) | ||
| public void beforeClass() throws URISyntaxException, IOException { | ||
| public void before_CosmosPartitionKeyTests() throws URISyntaxException, IOException { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
any reason for renaming this method to before_CosmosPartitionKeyTests
If we are changing the test name pattern for beforeClass we should be consistent everywhere.
on the other test class you changed to before_CosmosSyncStoredProcTest
If this change is needed could you be consistent on "test" vs "tests"
moderakh
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR brings in changes which are already merged in other PR:
#6312
Could you merge the target branch back to your branch to make sure this branch is not stale.
See #6289 and the test results that follow.]