Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Table: ListTablesOptions should have NextTableName property #122

Closed
joostdenijs opened this issue Jul 16, 2012 · 1 comment
Closed

Table: ListTablesOptions should have NextTableName property #122

joostdenijs opened this issue Jul 16, 2012 · 1 comment
Milestone

Comments

@joostdenijs
Copy link
Contributor

Moved from private repository.

If a query takes too long, it will return with partial results, and a continuation header specifying the NextTableName. This allows the queryTables method to get the next batch of entries, but currently that won't work for listTables, because the ListTablesOptions doesn't allow the user to specify that value.

The fix is to add the NextTableName property, and fix up the listTables method to forward that value into its call to queryTables.

Should match behavior for #105.

joostdenijs pushed a commit to joostdenijs/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this issue Jan 18, 2013
Updating serviceBus to map custom properties. Fixes Azure#72
@ghost ghost assigned jeffreyjirwin Feb 12, 2013
@gcheng
Copy link

gcheng commented Feb 12, 2013

ListTablesOptions class does not exist anymore.

@gcheng gcheng closed this as completed Feb 12, 2013
gcheng pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 25, 2013
jianghaolu pushed a commit to jianghaolu/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this issue Apr 5, 2017
navalev pushed a commit to navalev/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this issue Dec 24, 2019
Adding and using ApiKeyCredentials
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 13, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants