-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
Add 202 to operation checkPrivateLinkServiceVisibility #9800
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add 202 to operation checkPrivateLinkServiceVisibility #9800
Conversation
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
azure-sdk-for-net - Release
|
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Azure CLI Extension Generation - Release
No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured
|
azure-sdk-for-go - Release
|
Trenton Generation - Release
No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured
|
azure-sdk-for-python - Release
- Breaking Change detected in SDK
|
azure-sdk-for-java - Release
|
azure-sdk-for-js - Release
|
allenjzhang
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this change go all the way back to 2019-04-01 stable version?
|
@00Kai0 Please fix ModelValidation as well. Meanwhile, could you please share the context about this change? This api has been there for one year. Is it a bug fix or a new design? |
|
yeah, I tested with version 2019-04-01. It also retuened 202. |
|
Please also do this change in |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
azure-sdk-for-python-track2 - Release
|
|
@00Kai0 Please follow @number213 's instruction. I think the better way is to open a PR targeting at |
|
it's ready. #9821 |
|
Closed this PR since it's useless. #9821 |
|
@myronfanqiu I assumed since it's a bugfix it should update all versions. I think we sohuld also take this PR in |
|
@number213, I saw same changes in #9821. Do you mean we should open this PR and merge this one? |
|
@myronfanqiu i yep, this PR fixes all API versions in master, while the other one introduces a fix only in upcoming API version |
But in #9821, it also fixes 2020-04-01 version. |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
Adding a new response code to existing apis/versions is a breaking change. |
|
Hi @ravbhatnagar , this PR is to correct the response code in swagger so that it can match what service side actually return. Shall it be a bug fix?
|
|
@changlong-liu it is suppossed to be a bugfix AFAIK |
|
@ravbhatnagar Can you put this as high priority. Since it's a bugfix. The breakingchange failure should be ok. right? |
|
Signing off from ARM side. |
|
@akning-ms Hello. Could you help us merge this PR since it's a bug fix. |
* add 202 to operation checkPrivateLinkServiceVisibility * update examples
add code 202 to fix this operation.
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#11601