-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.7k
CMK support for VMware migration and addition of few properties for VMware DR monitoring #8390
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
weidongxu-microsoft
merged 8 commits into
Azure:master
from
AsrOneSdk:anbhat/cmk_resync
Mar 10, 2020
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
068363a
cmk, v2a monitotring
anmolbhatia289 3f176ed
property type fix
anmolbhatia289 a061b80
reflecting properties in examples, and adding readOnly tag
anmolbhatia289 4356321
spacing fixes
anmolbhatia289 3e9c609
added missed readOnly property
anmolbhatia289 ae374c5
added missed property
anmolbhatia289 5d24517
running prettier
anmolbhatia289 f6ac0b0
Fixing the sdk generation issue.
punit-bhatt File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -49,4 +49,4 @@ | |
| }, | ||
| "202": {} | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This appears to be the only non-readonly field your adding which constitutes a breaking change and requires a new api version.
See 'New property added to response'
https://microsoft.sharepoint.com/:w:/t/azureresourcemanagerteam/EWXsAQ1yx25KkyYCeeWGUgwBSBxEdUDEbHi6FZ__U8EOQw?e=xEcppo
I see you have the response with this field marked as readonly but it still breaks the get-put scenario called out in the doc.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As this is an optional input property and which cannot be updated once set, won’t this be safe in the PUT -> GET -> PUT scenario? From service side, we retain the existing value of this property if a new PUT comes where this value is not set (the property is tagged as “read-only” in the response).
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is x-ms-mutability which might help in this situation (Though I am not sure how different code generator would handle it. Well at least for human reader, the intention would be clearer).
I guess we know many service actually use merge in PUT to handle backward compatibility. But that is really a service by service (or even endpoint by endpoint?) solution, so I think ARM had to ask.