Skip to content

Conversation

@dandanwang0320
Copy link
Contributor

@dandanwang0320 dandanwang0320 commented Sep 13, 2019

Update to the latest api version.
Move Jit request changes to this PR.

Latest improvements:

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

  • I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
  • The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Service team MUST add the "WaitForARMFeedback" label if the management plane API changes fall into one of the below categories.
  • adding/removing APIs.
  • adding/removing properties.
  • adding/removing API-version.
  • adding a new service in Azure.

Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged urgently, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
    Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.

Please diff later commits with this one for the changes.
Add Jit requests.
Try fix Model validation.
@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Sep 13, 2019

In Testing, Please Ignore

[Logs] (Generated from 15cad4f, Iteration 4)

Warning .NET: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-net [Logs] [Diff]
  • No packages generated.
Failed Python: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-python [Logs]
  • No packages generated.
Failed Java: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-java [Logs] [Diff]
  • Failed features/resource-manager/v2015_12_01 [Logs] [Generation PR]
  • Failed locks/resource-manager/v2016_09_01 [Logs]
  • Failed policy/resource-manager/v2016_12_01 [Logs]
  • Failed policy/resource-manager/v2018_03_01 [Logs]
  • Failed policy/resource-manager/v2018_05_01 [Logs]
  • Failed policy/resource-manager/v2019_01_01 [Logs]
  • Failed policy/resource-manager/v2019_06_01 [Logs]
  • Failed resources/resource-manager/v2016_06_01 [Logs]
  • Failed resources/resource-manager/v2016_09_01 [Logs]
  • Failed resources/resource-manager/v2018_02_01 [Logs]
  • Failed resources/resource-manager/v2018_06_01 [Logs]
  • Failed resources/resource-manager/v2019_03_01 [Logs]
  • Failed resources/resource-manager/v2019_05_01 [Logs]
  • Failed resources/resource-manager/v2019_05_10 [Logs]
  • Failed resources/resource-manager/v2019_06_01 [Logs]
  • Failed resources/resource-manager/v2019_07_01 [Logs]
  • Failed resources/resource-manager/v2019_08_01 [Logs]
Succeeded Go: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-go [Logs] [Diff]
Failed JavaScript: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-js [Logs] [Diff]

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Sep 13, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

A PR has been created for you based on this PR content.

Once this PR will be merged, content will be added to your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#8406

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Sep 13, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#6315

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

"Applications"
],
"operationId": "Applications_CreateOrUpdate",
"description": "Creates a new managed application.",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Create or Update per operationId?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry these are just copied from the old version. Could you ignore the first commit during review?

"Applications"
],
"operationId": "Applications_ListByResourceGroup",
"description": "Gets all the applications within a resource group.",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

List all...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is also from the old version.

}
}
},
"/{applicationId}": {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/providers/Microsoft.Solutions/applications/{applicationId} ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the fully qualified application Id. Also it's from the old version.

@yungezz yungezz added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Sep 16, 2019
@yungezz
Copy link
Member

yungezz commented Sep 23, 2019

Hi @dandanwang0320 could you pls address comments from reviewing board?

@yungezz
Copy link
Member

yungezz commented Oct 8, 2019

Hi @dandanwang0320 are you still on this PR? or is it ok to close the PR if you're not ready for reviewing?

@dandanwang0320
Copy link
Contributor Author

@yungezz Yes. I replied some of your comments. Synced with Bryan offline for some necessary changes needed within ARM code.

@yungezz
Copy link
Member

yungezz commented Oct 10, 2019

HI @ryansbenson could you pls review the PR again after author's updating?

@dandanwang0320 dandanwang0320 changed the title Add new version for Microsoft.Solutions [Do not review]Add new version for Microsoft.Solutions Oct 21, 2019
@dandanwang0320
Copy link
Contributor Author

Will add more API/Properties as I'm fixing Ryan's comments.

@dandanwang0320
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @ryansbenson, I've resolved your comments and added several more resources to the new version to keep this updated.
Please take another look.

@dandanwang0320 dandanwang0320 changed the title [Do not review]Add new version for Microsoft.Solutions Add new version for Microsoft.Solutions Nov 1, 2019
Remove update access since it should be internal only(used by PIM team)
@dandanwang0320
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pilor I've responded/fixed the comments you left. We decided to remove one of the APIs since it's facing internal customers only(updateAccess).

@pilor pilor added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed ARMChangesRequested WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Nov 5, 2019
@yungezz
Copy link
Member

yungezz commented Nov 7, 2019

@dandanwang0320 is this PR ready to merge?

@dandanwang0320
Copy link
Contributor Author

dandanwang0320 commented Nov 7, 2019

@dandanwang0320 is this PR ready to merge?

Let's do it next Monday. Is it Ok?

Edit:
Back end change is finished. This PR is ready to merge now.

@raych1 raych1 merged commit 8e86c2f into Azure:master Nov 12, 2019
solhaile pushed a commit to solhaile/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2019
* First commit for new version folder with old files
Please diff later commits with this one for the changes.

* Update version.
Add Jit requests.
Try fix Model validation.

* Update operation Id

* Operations read, refresh permission, PR comments.

* Application definition artifact.

* Fix build

* Fix build

* Jit Patch

* Post async 202

* Fix example model valiation.

* Fix PR comments.
Remove update access since it should be internal only(used by PIM team)

* Capitalization to fix build.

* Read only properties

* Removed application definition artifact, which is internal and don't need a swagger.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants