Skip to content

Adding the specs for GA version of Events API#7134

Merged
michaeljqzq merged 16 commits intoAzure:masterfrom
srinathgrs:master
Sep 26, 2019
Merged

Adding the specs for GA version of Events API#7134
michaeljqzq merged 16 commits intoAzure:masterfrom
srinathgrs:master

Conversation

@srinathgrs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@srinathgrs srinathgrs commented Sep 5, 2019

Latest improvements:

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

  • I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
  • The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Service team MUST add the "WaitForARMFeedback" label if the management plane API changes fall into one of the below categories.
  • adding/removing APIs.
  • adding/removing properties.
  • adding/removing API-version.
  • adding a new service in Azure.

Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged urgently, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
    Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Sep 5, 2019

In Testing, Please Ignore

[Logs] (Generated from 10ffd47, Iteration 24)

In-Progress Go: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-go [Logs] [Diff]
  • Warning resourcehealth/mgmt/2015-01-01 [Logs]
  • Warning resourcehealth/mgmt/2017-07-01 [Logs]
In-Progress JavaScript: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-js [Logs]
  • Package generation in progress.
Failed Python: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-python [Logs]
  • No packages generated.
In-Progress Java: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-java [Logs] [Diff]
  • In-Progress resourcehealth/resource-manager/v2015_01_01 [Logs]
  • In-Progress resourcehealth/resource-manager/v2017_07_01 [Logs]
  • In-Progress resourcehealth/resource-manager/v2018_08_01_preview [Logs]
Failed .NET: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-net [Logs]
  • No packages generated.
Warning Ruby: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-ruby [Logs] [Diff]
  • No packages generated.

@AutorestCI
Copy link
Copy Markdown

AutorestCI commented Sep 5, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-python

@AutorestCI
Copy link
Copy Markdown

AutorestCI commented Sep 5, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-go

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@nschonni nschonni left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

occured -> occurred

srinathgrs and others added 11 commits September 10, 2019 10:58
…ceHealth/stable/2018-07-01/ResourceHealth.json


fixing typo

Co-Authored-By: Nick Schonning <nschonni@gmail.com>
…ceHealth/stable/2018-07-01/examples/AvailabilityStatus_GetByResource.json


Fixing typo

Co-Authored-By: Nick Schonning <nschonni@gmail.com>
…ceHealth/stable/2018-07-01/examples/AvailabilityStatuses_List.json


Fixing typo

Co-Authored-By: Nick Schonning <nschonni@gmail.com>
…ceHealth/stable/2018-07-01/ResourceHealth.json


Fixing typo

Co-Authored-By: Nick Schonning <nschonni@gmail.com>
…ceHealth/stable/2018-07-01/examples/AvailabilityStatuses_List.json


Typo errors fixed

Co-Authored-By: Nick Schonning <nschonni@gmail.com>
…ceHealth/stable/2018-07-01/examples/AvailabilityStatuses_ListByResourceGroup.json


Typo errors fixed

Co-Authored-By: Nick Schonning <nschonni@gmail.com>
…ceHealth/stable/2018-07-01/examples/AvailabilityStatuses_ListBySubscriptionId.json


Typo errors fixed

Co-Authored-By: Nick Schonning <nschonni@gmail.com>
…ceHealth/stable/2018-07-01/examples/AvailabilityStatuses_ListBySubscriptionId.json


Typo errors fixed

Co-Authored-By: Nick Schonning <nschonni@gmail.com>
…ceHealth/stable/2018-07-01/examples/ImpactedResources_ListBySubscriptionId.json


Typo errors fixed

Co-Authored-By: Nick Schonning <nschonni@gmail.com>
…ceHealth/stable/2018-07-01/examples/ImpactedResources_ListBySubscriptionId.json


Typo errors fixed

Co-Authored-By: Nick Schonning <nschonni@gmail.com>
…ceHealth/stable/2018-07-01/examples/AvailabilityStatuses_ListByResourceGroup.json


Typo errors fixed

Co-Authored-By: Nick Schonning <nschonni@gmail.com>
@michaeljqzq michaeljqzq added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Sep 11, 2019
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@KrisBash KrisBash left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Events looks good. Please see questions regarding impacted resources

Impacted resources still in preview , not a GA candidate
@srinathgrs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I have updated the review based on the review comments , Could you please continue reviewing

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@KrisBash KrisBash left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM thanks

@KrisBash KrisBash added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed ARMChangesRequested WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Sep 24, 2019
@srinathgrs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

LGTM thanks

Thanks , Looks like i dont have access to merge this pull request . Will it be merged by the ARM team or should i raise a request to get access

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants