Conversation
In Testing, Please Ignore[Logs] (Generated from d0215e3, Iteration 8)
|
Automation for azure-sdk-for-pythonA PR has been created for you: |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-goThe initial PR has been merged into your service PR: |
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
anuchandy
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good from SDK side. Requested ARM review as it adds new APIs.
...-manager/Microsoft.ContainerRegistry/preview/2019-06-01-preview/containerregistry_build.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...-manager/Microsoft.ContainerRegistry/preview/2019-06-01-preview/containerregistry_build.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...-manager/Microsoft.ContainerRegistry/preview/2019-06-01-preview/containerregistry_build.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| "type": "Microsoft.ContainerRegistry/registries/TaskRuns", | ||
| "properties": { | ||
| "provisioningState": "Creating", | ||
| "runRequest": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As described above, the swagger spec doesn't document this schema or the other types.
|
hi @pan-wang could you pls address comments ? |
|
Thank so much for remaindering.
We are working on twitting the change for better ARM deployment experience. Will address all feedbacks soon once we land on final change.
Thanks
Pan
…________________________________
From: Yunge Zhu <notifications@github.com>
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2019 11:32 PM
To: Azure/azure-rest-api-specs <azure-rest-api-specs@noreply.github.com>
Cc: pan-wang <pan-wang@hotmail.com>; Mention <mention@noreply.github.com>
Subject: Re: [Azure/azure-rest-api-specs] Panwang/taskruns (#7123)
hi @pan-wang<https://github.com/pan-wang> could you pls address comments ?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#7123?email_source=notifications&email_token=AEKUVW7X75CINWR4D35NII3QNP5NJA5CNFSM4ITX26M2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEASQXII#issuecomment-539298721>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEKUVW3F7SCAWTDESRLVROTQNP5NJANCNFSM4ITX26MQ>.
|
|
@KrisBash Could we move forward for this PR? We would like to file a separate work item to solve the debt per discussion above. And there're two Ignore Test-Only CI fail. We can just ignore, right? |
...-manager/Microsoft.ContainerRegistry/preview/2019-06-01-preview/examples/TaskRunsCreate.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
I think you meant @KrisBash. For the CI failures, @anuchandy will need to weigh as the SDK team owns these checks. |
ravbhatnagar
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@pan-wang - one comment, please take a look. ALso some from Kris have not been addressed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is not the right schema for error. sample here - https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/master/specification/batch/resource-manager/Microsoft.Batch/stable/2019-08-01/BatchManagement.json#L105
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@ravbhatnagar Just submitted a new commit to solve the problem
|
Signing off from ARM side. |
|
@majastrz ARM signed off this change. Could you continue merge the manifest? |
|
@anuchandy Could you merge the PR? The manifest update was blocked now. |
095677d to
fca508d
Compare
216765f to
f14a1fb
Compare
Latest improvements:
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Contribution checklist:
ARM API Review Checklist
Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.
Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.