Skip to content

Dev storagecache microsoft.storagecache 2019 06 01 preview#7043

Merged
lirenhe merged 55 commits intoAzure:masterfrom
romahamu:dev-storagecache-microsoft.storagecache-2019-06-01-preview
Aug 30, 2019
Merged

Dev storagecache microsoft.storagecache 2019 06 01 preview#7043
lirenhe merged 55 commits intoAzure:masterfrom
romahamu:dev-storagecache-microsoft.storagecache-2019-06-01-preview

Conversation

@romahamu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

SDK and ARM team reviews are done in the private repository with PR https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs-pr/pull/675
@waffe7 @mozehgir @sergey-shandar

Latest improvements:

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

  • I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
  • The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Service team MUST add the "WaitForARMFeedback" label if the management plane API changes fall into one of the below categories.
  • adding/removing APIs.
  • adding/removing properties.
  • adding/removing API-version.
  • adding a new service in Azure.

Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged urgently, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
    Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.

Matt White and others added 30 commits February 5, 2019 17:29
…toragecache-2019-06-01-preview

initial swagger for StorageCache RP
…toragecache-2019-06-01-preview

review edits
…toragecache-2019-06-01-preview

fix cosmetic stuff with tabs, added path for storagetarget that was f…
2. "Cluster" -> "Cache" globally
3. targettype enum fixed to have unknown type for future insurance
4. usage models examples fixed; they have short nonlocalized names now
5. x-ms-discriminator tag added to StorageTargets
6. modelasstring has been changed to true for enums
7. Avere expunged
8. vFXT expunged
…toragecache-2019-06-01-preview

* fixed readOnly; it was erroneously on some Cache properties
* "Cluster" -> "Cache" globally
* targettype enum fixed to have unknown type for future insurance
* usage models examples fixed; they have short nonlocalized names now
* x-ms-discriminator tag added to StorageTargets
* modelasstring has been changed to true for enums
* Avere expunged
* vFXT expunged
* converted path property on StorageTarget from string to array of namespaceJunctions
* removed some dead code and misc cosmetic cleanup
…toragecache-2019-06-01-preview

fix typo in databox json
…toragecache-2019-06-01-preview

added python generation file
…toragecache-2019-06-01-preview

add swagger to sdk section
* add some provisioning states for cache
* update a few doc strings
* make usagemodel display an object instead of string
…toragecache-2019-06-01-preview

* add provisioning state to storage targets
…toragecache-2019-06-01-preview

capitalize states for consistency, add Unknown
change cache listing and skus
@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Aug 26, 2019

@AutorestCI
Copy link
Copy Markdown

AutorestCI commented Aug 26, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#7015

@AutorestCI
Copy link
Copy Markdown

AutorestCI commented Aug 26, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#5661

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@nschonni nschonni left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mozehgir
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@lirenhe - as @romahamu mentioned - the review was already done by SDK and ARM team in private repo https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs-pr/pull/675
Should be good to merge as long as we have no errors.

Remove Node.js triggers for SDK generation
@lirenhe lirenhe merged commit d5f55fc into Azure:master Aug 30, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants