Skip to content

Support DataLakeStorage 10-31-19 version#7032

Merged
yungezz merged 3 commits intoAzure:masterfrom
DadanielZ:DataLakeStorage10-31-19
Sep 17, 2019
Merged

Support DataLakeStorage 10-31-19 version#7032
yungezz merged 3 commits intoAzure:masterfrom
DadanielZ:DataLakeStorage10-31-19

Conversation

@DadanielZ
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Latest improvements:

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

  • I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
  • The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Service team MUST add the "WaitForARMFeedback" label if the management plane API changes fall into one of the below categories.
  • adding/removing APIs.
  • adding/removing properties.
  • adding/removing API-version.
  • adding a new service in Azure.

Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged urgently, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
    Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Aug 23, 2019

In Testing, Please Ignore

[Logs] (Generated from c350081, Iteration 5)

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request.

@AutorestCI
Copy link
Copy Markdown

AutorestCI commented Aug 23, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-go

@AutorestCI
Copy link
Copy Markdown

AutorestCI commented Aug 23, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-python

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@erich-wang erich-wang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@DadanielZ , please follow step 6 in https://github.com/Azure/adx-documentation-pr/wiki/Review-Process:-Adding-new-API-version:
Please note that it is time-consuming to review the file line by line for every api-version. When you are creating the swagger specification for the new api-version, please copy the swagger specification from the previous version into the new api-versioned folder and commit it. After that overwrite it with the changes for the new api-version. This makes it easy for us to review the changes.

@DadanielZ DadanielZ force-pushed the DataLakeStorage10-31-19 branch from 299a476 to 6d4ed71 Compare August 26, 2019 18:17
@DadanielZ
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@erich-wang updated.

"info": {
"description": "Azure Data Lake Storage provides storage for Hadoop and other big data workloads.",
"title": "Azure Data Lake Storage REST API",
"version": "2018-11-09",
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

update version?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated.

@erich-wang erich-wang added the APIStewardshipBoard-ReviewRequested This should be reviewed by the Azure API Stewardship team in partnership with the service team. label Aug 26, 2019
@erich-wang
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

erich-wang commented Aug 26, 2019

@yungezz , could you assign someone to take a look at Breaking change error in CI?

@yungezz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

yungezz commented Aug 27, 2019

hi @michaeljqzq could you pls help to look at the breaking change failure? thanks.

@yungezz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

yungezz commented Aug 27, 2019

Hi @erich-wang , after investigation @michaeljqzq identified error in breakingChange tool is a tool issue, he will fix it. Pls ping me to force merge the PR when reviewing done. Thanks!

@DadanielZ
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@erich-wang @yungezz could you help to merge it if the review is done?

@erich-wang
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@DadanielZ , we're waiting for review from azure api board, that's why I added label WaitingForAzureAPIBoard. I'll ping them if no response next week.

@DadanielZ
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi @erich-wang, could you help to ping azure api board to review? thanks!

@erich-wang
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hi @erich-wang, could you help to ping azure api board to review? thanks!

Already sent email this morning.

@DadanielZ
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

DadanielZ commented Sep 5, 2019

@erich-wang thanks, is there anyone reviewing this PR?

@erich-wang
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@erich-wang thanks, is there anyone reviewing this PR?

I've sent email to api review team and you were in the email thread.

"x-ms-parameter-location": "client"
},
"dnsSuffix": {
"default": "dfs.core.windows.net",
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Default values for required parameters are not allowed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@DadanielZ DadanielZ Sep 16, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @johanste, thanks for the review. but these are not part of this PR.
I was following step 6 in https://github.com/Azure/adx-documentation-pr/wiki/Review-Process:-Adding-new-API-version:
copy the swagger specification from the previous version into the new api-versioned folder and commit it. After that overwrite it with the changes for the new api-version.
So this makes it easy for you to review the changes.

All the changes for the new API is in 6d4ed71
and c350081,
Thanks.

"type": "boolean"
},
"lastModified": {
"type": "string"
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't this a date-time? Or is the precision too high/more than milliseconds - and if so, is there really a need to use sub-millisecond granularity?

}
}
},
"Path": {
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are none of the properties required?

"group": {
"type": "string"
},
"permissions": {
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The plural in the property name usually implies that the value is a collection (list etc.).

"in": "header",
"required": false,
"type": "string"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While technically correct, this description is probably not the best for human consumption. I would recommend describing what the different positions mean.

If you want to provide a regex, you can do so using the pattern, minLength and maxLength properties.

@johanste
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Only one optional query parameter added. No need for full REST API review in front of board. Signed off.

@johanste johanste removed the APIStewardshipBoard-ReviewRequested This should be reviewed by the Azure API Stewardship team in partnership with the service team. label Sep 17, 2019
@erich-wang
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run public.rest-api-specs

@azure-pipelines
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@PhoenixHe-NV PhoenixHe-NV reopened this Sep 17, 2019
@yungezz yungezz merged commit 0f75a7a into Azure:master Sep 17, 2019
@DadanielZ
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thank you for your help! @johanste @erich-wang @NullMDR @yungezz

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants