Skip to content

Comments

fix: datacatalog model validation errors#6831

Merged
yungezz merged 1 commit intoAzure:masterfrom
nschonni:fix--datacatalog-model-validaiton-errors
Aug 15, 2019
Merged

fix: datacatalog model validation errors#6831
yungezz merged 1 commit intoAzure:masterfrom
nschonni:fix--datacatalog-model-validaiton-errors

Conversation

@nschonni
Copy link
Contributor

@nschonni nschonni commented Aug 1, 2019

Remove null body and headers for RESPONSE_SCHEMA_NOT_IN_SPEC errors

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Aug 1, 2019

In Testing, Please Ignore

[Logs] (Generated from 3591405, Iteration 3)

Warning Go: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-go [Logs] [Diff]
  • Warning datacatalog/mgmt/2016-03-30 [Logs]
Warning JavaScript: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-js [Logs] [Diff]
  • Warning @azure/arm-datacatalog [Logs]

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Aug 1, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

Unable to detect any generation context from this PR.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Aug 1, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

Unable to detect any generation context from this PR.

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

Remove null body and headers for RESPONSE_SCHEMA_NOT_IN_SPEC errors
@nschonni nschonni force-pushed the fix--datacatalog-model-validaiton-errors branch from 6a8aebf to 3591405 Compare August 1, 2019 21:21
@nschonni nschonni changed the title fix: datacatalog model validaiton errors fix: datacatalog model validation errors Aug 1, 2019
@yungezz
Copy link
Member

yungezz commented Aug 7, 2019

HI @anuchandy could you pls review this PR?

@yungezz yungezz merged commit 00cc713 into Azure:master Aug 15, 2019
@nschonni nschonni deleted the fix--datacatalog-model-validaiton-errors branch August 15, 2019 12:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants