Skip to content

fix: hybriddatamanager model validation errors#6830

Merged
sergey-shandar merged 1 commit intoAzure:masterfrom
nschonni:fix--hybriddatamanager-model-validation-errors
Aug 5, 2019
Merged

fix: hybriddatamanager model validation errors#6830
sergey-shandar merged 1 commit intoAzure:masterfrom
nschonni:fix--hybriddatamanager-model-validation-errors

Conversation

@nschonni
Copy link
Contributor

@nschonni nschonni commented Aug 1, 2019

Remove empty "body" for RESPONSE_SCHEMA_NOT_IN_SPEC errors

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Aug 1, 2019

In Testing, Please Ignore

[Logs] (Generated from 8b8e7d0, Iteration 2)

Warning Go: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-go [Logs] [Diff]
  • Warning hybriddatamanager/mgmt/2016-06-01 [Logs]
Warning Java: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-java [Logs] [Diff]
  • Warning azure-mgmt-hybriddatamanager [Logs]
Warning JavaScript: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-js [Logs] [Diff]
  • No packages generated.
Warning Python: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-python [Logs] [Diff]
  • No packages generated.
Warning Ruby: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-ruby [Logs] [Diff]
  • No packages generated.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Aug 1, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

Unable to detect any generation context from this PR.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Aug 1, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

Unable to detect any generation context from this PR.

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

Remove empty "body" for RESPONSE_SCHEMA_NOT_IN_SPEC errors
@nschonni nschonni force-pushed the fix--hybriddatamanager-model-validation-errors branch from 41b147a to 8b8e7d0 Compare August 1, 2019 20:19
@sergey-shandar sergey-shandar merged commit bcf9254 into Azure:master Aug 5, 2019
@nschonni nschonni deleted the fix--hybriddatamanager-model-validation-errors branch August 5, 2019 18:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants