Skip to content

fixed next link in storagesync#6810

Merged
mmyyrroonn merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
next-link-storagesync
Aug 2, 2019
Merged

fixed next link in storagesync#6810
mmyyrroonn merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
next-link-storagesync

Conversation

@zikalino
Copy link

This PR is fixing a problem with nextLink.

According to the guidelines below, nextLink should never be empty string.
I am fixing examples in specs first and in the same time this should be escalated with service teams.
If the service returns empty string I will escalate this accordingly.

Please note that not following this guideline may result in unpredictable behaviour of client implementations.

https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/resource-api-reference.md#get-resource

If a resource provider does not support paging, it should return the same body (JSON object with "value" property) but omit nextLink entirely (or set to null, not empty string) for future compatibility.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jul 31, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

Unable to detect any generation context from this PR.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jul 31, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

Unable to detect any generation context from this PR.

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jul 31, 2019

SDK Automation [Logs] (Generated from 27a4329, Iteration 1)

In-Progress Python: Azure/azure-sdk-for-python [Logs]
  • Package generation in progress.
In-Progress Java: Azure/azure-sdk-for-java [Logs]
  • Package generation in progress.
In-Progress Go: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-go [Logs]
  • Package generation in progress.
In-Progress JavaScript: Azure/azure-sdk-for-js [Logs]
  • Package generation in progress.

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@mmyyrroonn mmyyrroonn merged commit f496662 into master Aug 2, 2019
@anpint anpint deleted the next-link-storagesync branch April 8, 2021 22:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants