Description review edits For Redis Cache swaggers

[steved0x]

This checklist is used to make sure that common issues in a pull request are addressed. This will expedite the process of getting your pull request merged and avoid extra work on your part to fix issues discovered during the review process.

PR information

• The title of the PR is clear and informative.
• There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For information on cleaning up the commits in your pull request, see this page.
• Except for special cases involving multiple contributors, the PR is started from a fork of the main repository, not a branch.
• If applicable, the PR references the bug/issue that it fixes.
• Swagger files are correctly named (e.g. the api-version in the path should match the api-version in the spec).

Quality of Swagger

• I have read the contribution guidelines.
• My spec meets the review criteria:
  • The spec conforms to the Swagger 2.0 specification.
  • Validation errors from the Linter extension for VS Code have all been fixed for this spec. (Note: for large, previously checked in specs, there will likely be many errors shown. Please contact our team so we can set a timeframe for fixing these errors if your PR is not going to address them).
  • The spec follows the patterns described in the Swagger good patterns document unless the service API makes this impossible.

---

This change is

[azurecla]

Hi @steved0x, I'm your friendly neighborhood Azure Pull Request Bot (You can call me AZPRBOT). Thanks for your contribution!

It looks like you're working at Microsoft (sdanie). If you're full-time, we DON'T require a contribution license agreement.

If you are a vendor, DO please sign the electronic contribution license agreement. It will take 2 minutes and there's no faxing! https://cla.azure.com.

TTYL, AZPRBOT;

[steved0x]

Most of the checklist above doesn't apply to me since I did not author the swagger - I just edited the descriptions on a previously approved and merged swagger.

[steved0x]

#sign-off

[amarzavery]

@steved0x - Dont you think the description should not have keywords like .NET and client in it? The spec is a representation of the API and would be used to generate clients in different languages. Plus it wouldnt look good to have the word client specified in the ref docs.

[steved0x]

@amarzavery I made the requested changes, thank you.

[AutorestCI]

Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#870

[AutorestCI]

Azure/azure-sdk-for-node#1971

[AutorestCI]

No modification for Python

[AutorestCI]

Azure/azure-sdk-for-ruby#568