Skip to content

Conversation

@assing
Copy link
Contributor

@assing assing commented Mar 14, 2019

Latest improvements:

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

  • I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
  • The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Service team MUST add the "WaitForARMFeedback" label if the management plane API changes fall into one of the below categories.
  • adding/removing APIs.
  • adding/removing properties.
  • adding/removing API-version.
  • adding a new service in Azure.

Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged urgently, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
    Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Mar 14, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-ruby

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-ruby

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Mar 14, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-js

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-js

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Mar 14, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#3723

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Mar 14, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-java

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-java

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Mar 14, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-node

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-node

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Mar 14, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-go

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@praries880 praries880 added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Mar 14, 2019
@sanjaiganesh
Copy link
Contributor

Looking to sync up with Ashutosh to understand the resource model

@dsgouda
Copy link
Contributor

dsgouda commented Mar 18, 2019

Rest spec to Net Sdk code generation is not supported for new RPs, they will be onboarded separately. Please do not block on the Automation for azure-sdk-for-net failure for this review.

@praries880
Copy link

@antmarti-microsoft Can you validate that the latest commit took care of your feedback?

@sanjaiganesh sanjaiganesh added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Mar 26, 2019
@assing
Copy link
Contributor Author

assing commented Mar 26, 2019

@praries880 I think I can't merge this PR. Can you please merge this PR?

@praries880 praries880 merged commit cc40e3c into Azure:master Mar 26, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants