[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages to add version 2019-02-01-preview#5289
Conversation
Automation for azure-sdk-for-rubyNothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-ruby |
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-pythonThe initial PR has been merged into your service PR: |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-jsA PR has been created for you based on this PR content. Once this PR will be merged, content will be added to your service PR: |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-nodeA PR has been created for you: |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-javaThe initial PR has been merged into your service PR: |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-goA PR has been created for you based on this PR content. Once this PR will be merged, content will be added to your service PR: |
.../Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/preview/2019-02-01-preview/examples/CreateImageTemplate.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...resource-manager/Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/preview/2019-02-01-preview/imagebuilder.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...resource-manager/Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/preview/2019-02-01-preview/imagebuilder.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...resource-manager/Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/preview/2019-02-01-preview/imagebuilder.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
796ebc9 to
9ebd633
Compare
...resource-manager/Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/preview/2019-02-01-preview/imagebuilder.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
@paulmey can we use the plural form for operation group, VirtualMachineImageTemplate_xx -> VirtualMachineImageTemplates_xx ? |
anuchandy
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please see the comment on using plural form for operation group.
operation_id: plural forms
This is done. Can we merge this so that we can start reviewing the next API version? |
|
@dsgouda should I wait for https://github.com/Azure/AzNetSdkTools/issues/133 to close before merging this? |
|
We'll start a review for our 2019-05-01-preview version immediately after this one gets merged... so if we can carry that issue over... 😉 |
|
@anuchandy We are not supporting new RPs for Automation for Net Sdk today, you can proceed with the review. |
...resource-manager/Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/preview/2019-02-01-preview/imagebuilder.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Please merge |
|
@AutorestCI regenerate azure-sdk-for-go |
If you are a MSFT employee you can view your work branch via this link.
Contribution checklist:
Changes with 2018-02-01-preview: