Skip to content

Conversation

@lmazuel
Copy link
Member

@lmazuel lmazuel commented Jan 4, 2019

No description provided.

@lmazuel lmazuel self-assigned this Jan 4, 2019
@openapi-portal-comment
Copy link

If you're a MSFT employee, click this link
to view this PR's validation status on our new OpenAPI Hub spec management tool.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jan 4, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-js

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-js

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jan 4, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-ruby

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-ruby

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jan 4, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-go

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jan 4, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-java

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-java

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jan 4, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-node

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-node

@kpajdzik kpajdzik added the review label Jan 4, 2019
@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jan 4, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#3913

@lmazuel lmazuel merged commit 7c5ca6a into Azure:master Jan 4, 2019
@lmazuel lmazuel deleted the pynetwork201811 branch January 4, 2019 20:02
@kpajdzik kpajdzik removed the review label Jan 4, 2019
TalluriAnusha pushed a commit to AsrOneSdk/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2019
mccleanp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2022
…rce provider (#4988)

* Updated edatype defintion in workload

* Fixed semantic validation error
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants