Skip to content

Conversation

@julienstroheker
Copy link
Contributor

  • Add the OpenShiftManagedClusters_ListByResourceGroup + Example
  • OpenShiftManagedClusters_List route + Example
  • Update existing examples
  • Add the new supported SKUs

Contribution checklist:

  • I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
  • The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

…agedClusters_List route + Examples

Update the Examples
Add the new supported SKUs
@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 28, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#3378

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 28, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-node

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-node#4437

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 28, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-js

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-js#816

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 28, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-ruby

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-ruby#2072

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 28, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-java

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-java

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 28, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#3685

@jhendrixMSFT
Copy link
Member

@AutorestCI regenerate azure-sdk-for-go

@jhendrixMSFT
Copy link
Member

@AutorestCI regenerate azure-sdk-for-python

@jhendrixMSFT
Copy link
Member

@lmazuel can you please take a look at the python SDK build failure?

@ravbhatnagar ravbhatnagar added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Nov 29, 2018
@julienstroheker
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jhendrixMSFT Any progress on this ? Thanks

@jhendrixMSFT
Copy link
Member

@lmazuel needs to look at the python build failure as it's a blocking issue.

@jhendrixMSFT
Copy link
Member

@AutorestCI regenerate azure-sdk-for-go

@jhendrixMSFT
Copy link
Member

Also I see @ravbhatnagar added the WaitForARMFeedback label. Is this still pending review?

@ravbhatnagar
Copy link
Contributor

@RyanBensonMSFT for review from ARM side.

@KrisBash KrisBash added the ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review label Dec 6, 2018
Copy link
Contributor

@KrisBash KrisBash left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes lgtm

@KrisBash KrisBash removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Dec 6, 2018
@jhendrixMSFT
Copy link
Member

Going to close then re-open to see if this fixes CI.

@openapi-portal-comment
Copy link

If you're a MSFT employee, click this link
to view this PR's validation status on our new OpenAPI Hub spec management tool.

@lmazuel lmazuel merged commit 13b129e into Azure:master Dec 11, 2018
@kpajdzik kpajdzik removed the review label Dec 11, 2018
@julienstroheker julienstroheker deleted the containerservice-osa-preview2 branch December 11, 2018 19:19
TalluriAnusha pushed a commit to AsrOneSdk/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2019
* Add the OpenShiftManagedClusters_ListByResourceGroup and OpenShiftManagedClusters_List route + Examples
Update the Examples
Add the new supported SKUs

* Fix API Version in example

* remove private preview count limitations

* Update description to remove min and max limitations
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants