Skip to content

Conversation

@vipul-modi
Copy link

…-preview release.

Latest improvements:

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

  • I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
  • The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

@openapi-portal-comment
Copy link

If you're a MSFT employee, click this link
to view this PR's validation status on our new OpenAPI Hub spec management tool.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 27, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-ruby

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-ruby

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 27, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#3865

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 27, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-node

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-node#4180

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 27, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-js

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-js#569

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 27, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#3607

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 27, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-java

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#2265

@vipul-modi
Copy link
Author

#sign-off - Ready to merge

@lmazuel
Copy link
Member

lmazuel commented Nov 29, 2018

@AutorestCI regenerate azure-sdk-for-python

@Christina-Kang
Copy link

@sarangan12 please let me know if there is anything else required before merging. Otherwise, this is ready to merge. Thank you!

@vipul-modi
Copy link
Author

@sarangan12 or @sergey-shandar can one of you please merge this?

@sarangan12 sarangan12 removed their assignment Dec 3, 2018
@sarangan12 sarangan12 removed their request for review December 3, 2018 21:44
@nschonni
Copy link
Contributor

nschonni commented Dec 3, 2018

Looks like this has some of the same typos as #4528

…-> returns, commited -> committed, Double word "maximum", Double word "with"
@vipul-modi
Copy link
Author

Updated - we generate our Swagger files from multiple files managed by different teams in our repo and this change was missing from there. Going forward it should have this change.

@Christina-Kang
Copy link

#sign-off - Ready to merge

@suhuruli
Copy link

suhuruli commented Dec 4, 2018

@sarangan12, can you please help with this or let us know how we can speed this process up?

@vipul-modi
Copy link
Author

@salameer - can you please help us get this published. We are blocked on releasing new SFCTL and Maven CLI.

@sarangan12 sarangan12 merged commit 3c85214 into Azure:master Dec 5, 2018
TalluriAnusha pushed a commit to AsrOneSdk/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2019
)

* Swagger specification for Service Fabric runtime version 6.4

* fix typos specificed -> specified, sucessful -> successful, resturns -> returns, commited -> committed, Double word "maximum", Double word "with"

* typo: Parition to Partition

* remove invalid character
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants