Conversation
|
If you're a MSFT employee, click this link |
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-rubyNothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-ruby |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-pythonThe initial PR has been merged into your service PR: |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-nodeThe initial PR has been merged into your service PR: |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-jsThe initial PR has been merged into your service PR: |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-javaNothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-java |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-goNothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-go |
...source-manager/Microsoft.Subscription/preview/2018-11-01-preview/examples/getOperations.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...iption/resource-manager/Microsoft.Subscription/preview/2018-11-01-preview/subscriptions.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ger/Microsoft.Subscription/preview/2018-11-01-preview/examples/getSubscriptionOperation.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...iption/resource-manager/Microsoft.Subscription/preview/2018-11-01-preview/subscriptions.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
@mjfrb has this API been reviewed by ARM yet? |
|
Yes, this needs to be reviewed by ARM, I've sent mail requesting this |
|
It's my understanding that Guarav signed off on this. |
|
This was reviewed in person by ARM. Signing off from ARM side. @mjfrb - Just one thing, you dont need to model the API for tracking the status of long running operation in swagger. It comes from the header. But removing may mean a breaking change. |
| "provider": "Microsoft Subscription", | ||
| "resource": "Resources", | ||
| "operation": "Create a subscription", | ||
| "description": "Create an Azure subscription." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The description isn't part of the schema and is causing validation errors, see the log.
Latest improvements:
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Contribution checklist: