Skip to content

Conversation

@ilidemi
Copy link
Contributor

@ilidemi ilidemi commented Aug 31, 2018

Building on top of #3716.

Current spec generates AdditionalProperties as object, it would be more convenient to have a Dictionary<string, object> instead.

This is not a breaking change as the RP backend is not live yet.

PR information

  • The title of the PR is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For information on cleaning up the commits in your pull request, see this page.
  • Except for special cases involving multiple contributors, the PR is started from a fork of the main repository, not a branch.
  • If applicable, the PR references the bug/issue that it fixes.
  • Swagger files are correctly named (e.g. the api-version in the path should match the api-version in the spec).

Quality of Swagger

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Aug 31, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#3208

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Sep 1, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-ruby

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-ruby

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Sep 1, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-node

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-node

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Sep 1, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-java

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-java

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Sep 1, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-go

@lmazuel lmazuel merged commit 7eb1987 into Azure:master Sep 4, 2018
mccleanp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2022
* Making OSType puttable

* Adding readonly resource status information
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants