Event Hubs 2018-01-01: correction in the type of List API of VirtualNetwork

[v-Ajnava]

This checklist is used to make sure that common issues in a pull request are addressed. This will expedite the process of getting your pull request merged and avoid extra work on your part to fix issues discovered during the review process.

PR information

• The title of the PR is clear and informative.
• There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For information on cleaning up the commits in your pull request, see this page.
• Except for special cases involving multiple contributors, the PR is started from a fork of the main repository, not a branch.
• If applicable, the PR references the bug/issue that it fixes.
• Swagger files are correctly named (e.g. the api-version in the path should match the api-version in the spec).

Quality of Swagger

• I have read the contribution guidelines.
• My spec meets the review criteria:
  • The spec conforms to the Swagger 2.0 specification.
  • [X ] The spec follows the guidelines described in the Swagger checklist document.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.

[azuresdkci]

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

[AutorestCI]

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#3240

[AutorestCI]

Automation for azure-sdk-for-ruby

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-ruby

[AutorestCI]

Automation for azure-sdk-for-node

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-node

[AutorestCI]

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-go

[AutorestCI]

Automation for azure-sdk-for-java

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-java

[annatisch]

Thanks @v-Ajnava - are you able to please fix the failing model validation test?
I'm aware that the failing example is unrelated to your change - so I wont block on it - but it would be great if we could get the CI passing :)

The only change required is to remove the "description" field from each of the response operation values - as you can see in the definition, there's no "description" property.

Thanks!

[v-Ajnava]

@annatisch actually removed the operations API, we dont support it on preview for now

[annatisch]

Thanks @v-Ajnava - isn't removing the Operations API an ARM violation?

[v-Ajnava]

@annatisch you are right, will add it back.

[v-Ajnava]

@annatisch, reverted remove the operation API commit. the Modal validation is fixed in previous commit. so it should be good for review