Skip to content

[Storage] Add StorageErrorCode enum to TypeSpec def#37542

Merged
vincenttran-msft merged 5 commits intofeature/blob-tsp-rustfrom
vincenttran/storage_error_enums
Sep 17, 2025
Merged

[Storage] Add StorageErrorCode enum to TypeSpec def#37542
vincenttran-msft merged 5 commits intofeature/blob-tsp-rustfrom
vincenttran/storage_error_enums

Conversation

@vincenttran-msft
Copy link
Member

As title states.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 17, 2025

Next Steps to Merge

Important checks have failed. As of today they are not blocking this PR, but in near future they may.
Addressing the following failures is highly recommended:
  • ⚠️ The check named SDK Validation Status has failed. Refer to the check in the PR's 'Checks' tab for details on how to fix it and consult the aka.ms/ci-fix guide
If you still want to proceed merging this PR without addressing the above failures, refer to step 4 in the PR workflow diagram.

Comment generated by summarize-checks workflow run.

@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added the Storage Storage Service (Queues, Blobs, Files) label Sep 17, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the TypeSpec Authored with TypeSpec label Sep 17, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

API Change Check

APIView identified API level changes in this PR and created the following API reviews

Language API Review for Package
TypeSpec Storage.Blob

@vincenttran-msft vincenttran-msft marked this pull request as ready for review September 17, 2025 23:14
@vincenttran-msft vincenttran-msft merged commit cc4322e into feature/blob-tsp-rust Sep 17, 2025
43 of 49 checks passed
@vincenttran-msft vincenttran-msft deleted the vincenttran/storage_error_enums branch September 17, 2025 23:16
@heaths heaths mentioned this pull request Jan 14, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Storage Storage Service (Queues, Blobs, Files) TypeSpec Authored with TypeSpec

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants