Skip to content

Conversation

@zhangyd2015
Copy link
Contributor

Added two missing operation API-s into swagger to make ARM happy.

Microsoft.DataFactory/factories/integrationRuntimes/linkedIntegrationRuntime/action
Microsoft.DataFactory/factories/integrationruntimes/nodes/read


This checklist is used to make sure that common issues in a pull request are addressed. This will expedite the process of getting your pull request merged and avoid extra work on your part to fix issues discovered during the review process.

PR information

  • The title of the PR is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For information on cleaning up the commits in your pull request, see this page.
  • Except for special cases involving multiple contributors, the PR is started from a fork of the main repository, not a branch.
  • If applicable, the PR references the bug/issue that it fixes.
  • Swagger files are correctly named (e.g. the api-version in the path should match the api-version in the spec).

Quality of Swagger

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Aug 17, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-ruby

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-ruby

@zhangyd2015 zhangyd2015 changed the title Add two API-s to integration runtime Add two missing operation API-s to swagger for integration runtime Aug 17, 2018
@zhangyd2015 zhangyd2015 changed the title Add two missing operation API-s to swagger for integration runtime Add two missing operation API-s into swagger for integration runtime Aug 17, 2018
@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Aug 17, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#2293

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Aug 17, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-node

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-node#3396

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Aug 17, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-java

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#2136

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Aug 17, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#2513

@annatisch
Copy link
Member

Thanks @zhangyd2015 - there are a number of model validation errors in the examples (both new and old) - could you please take a look?

Thanks!

@zhangyd2015
Copy link
Contributor Author

@annatisch Fixed model validation errors in new examples.

Copy link
Member

@annatisch annatisch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - just a few tiny grammar errors in the descriptions.

"type": "string"
},
"dataFactoryLocation": {
"description": "The location of the data factory for which the linked integration runtime belong to.",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"The location of the data factory that the linked integration runtime belongs to."

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done. Thanks.

"type": "string"
},
"dataFactoryName": {
"description": "The name of the data factory for which the linked integration runtime belong to.",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"The name of the data factory that the linked integration runtime belongs to."

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done. Thanks.

"type": "string"
},
"subscriptionId": {
"description": "The subscription ID for which the linked integration runtime belong to.",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"The ID of the subscription that the linked integration runtime belongs to."

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done. Thanks.

@annatisch
Copy link
Member

Thanks @zhangyd2015 - are these new APIs that should be reviewed by ARM? Or are they already live in the service?

@zhangyd2015
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @annatisch. These APIs are already live in the service, they are used by our internal services, per to ARM compliance, they should be put into swagger. I don't think ARM team need review the two APIs.

@annatisch annatisch merged commit 5c2e240 into Azure:master Aug 22, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants