Skip to content

Update Details property of Recommended Actions API to resolve Swagger Model Validation#31062

Merged
UrosKrsticMIPerf merged 5 commits intoAzure:release-sql-Microsoft.Sql-2024-08-01-previewfrom
UrosKrsticMIPerf:dev/uroskrstic/fix-database-recommended-action-swagger
Oct 23, 2024
Merged

Update Details property of Recommended Actions API to resolve Swagger Model Validation#31062
UrosKrsticMIPerf merged 5 commits intoAzure:release-sql-Microsoft.Sql-2024-08-01-previewfrom
UrosKrsticMIPerf:dev/uroskrstic/fix-database-recommended-action-swagger

Conversation

@UrosKrsticMIPerf
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

…rror

ARM (Control Plane) API Specification Update Pull Request

Tip

Overwhelmed by all this guidance? See the Getting help section at the bottom of this PR description.

PR review workflow diagram

Please understand this diagram before proceeding. It explains how to get your PR approved & merged.

spec_pr_review_workflow_diagram

Purpose of this PR

What's the purpose of this PR? Check the specific option that applies. This is mandatory!

Due diligence checklist

To merge this PR, you must go through the following checklist and confirm you understood
and followed the instructions by checking all the boxes:

  • I confirm this PR is modifying Azure Resource Manager (ARM) related specifications, and not data plane related specifications.
  • I have reviewed following Resource Provider guidelines, including
    ARM resource provider contract and
    REST guidelines (estimated time: 4 hours).
    I understand this is required before I can proceed to the diagram Step 2, "ARM API changes review", for this PR.

Additional information

Viewing API changes

For convenient view of the API changes made by this PR, refer to the URLs provided in the table
in the Generated ApiView comment added to this PR. You can use ApiView to show API versions diff.

Suppressing failures

If one or multiple validation error/warning suppression(s) is detected in your PR, please follow the
suppressions guide to get approval.

Getting help

  • First, please carefully read through this PR description, from top to bottom. Please fill out the Purpose of this PR and Due diligence checklist.
  • If you don't have permissions to remove or add labels to the PR, request write access per aka.ms/azsdk/access#request-access-to-rest-api-or-sdk-repositories
  • To understand what you must do next to merge this PR, see the Next Steps to Merge comment. It will appear within few minutes of submitting this PR and will continue to be up-to-date with current PR state.
  • For guidance on fixing this PR CI check failures, see the hyperlinks provided in given failure
    and https://aka.ms/ci-fix.
  • For help with ARM review (PR workflow diagram Step 2), see https://aka.ms/azsdk/pr-arm-review.
  • If the PR CI checks appear to be stuck in queued state, please add a comment with contents /azp run.
    This should result in a new comment denoting a PR validation pipeline has started and the checks should be updated after few minutes.
  • If the help provided by the previous points is not enough, post to https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel and link to this PR.

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Next Steps to Merge

✅ All automated merging requirements have been met! To get your PR merged, see aka.ms/azsdk/specreview/merge.

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Generated ApiView

Language Package Name ApiView Link
Go sdk/resourcemanager/sql/armsql There is no API change compared with the previous version
JavaScript @azure/arm-sql There is no API change compared with the previous version
.Net Azure.ResourceManager.Sql https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/1e3ea1e2dc2c4679b3acd45b20b81a18?revisionId=546dba2cdc8d4eaeab9bfd041e67f17f
Swagger Microsoft.Sql https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/86f9467cec6a49f899d90b4872280851?revisionId=b2e34c216a8f4f76aa3b2c0c7f60f1d3

"description": "Resource type.",
"type": "string",
"readOnly": true
}
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it was referring to common-types ProxyResource. Why to remove now as that is the suggested way

"additionalProperties": true,
"additionalProperties": {
"type": "string"
},
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use of additionalProperties is not allowed for properties owned by the service. The only time its ok to use it is when the properties are pass thru (user defined) and not subject to any validations. Please make this an array or provide an explanation for why you need this.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This has been used since the inception of the service, additionalProperties is already being used and has been for the last 9 years, I just wanted to fix the ModelValidation error, as the SQL ARM API team asked me to do that.

"additionalProperties": true,
"additionalProperties": {
"type": "string"
},
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use of additionalProperties is not allowed for properties owned by the service. The only time its ok to use it is when the properties are pass thru (user defined) and not subject to any validations. Please make this an array or provide an explanation for why you need this.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This has been used since the inception of the service, additionalProperties is already being used and has been for the last 9 years, I just wanted to fix the ModelValidation error, as the SQL ARM API team asked me to do that.

"additionalProperties": true,
"additionalProperties": {
"type": "string"
},
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use of additionalProperties is not allowed for properties owned by the service. The only time its ok to use it is when the properties are pass thru (user defined) and not subject to any validations. Please make this an array or provide an explanation for why you need this.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This has been used since the inception of the service, additionalProperties is already being used and has been for the last 9 years, I just wanted to fix the ModelValidation error, as the SQL ARM API team asked me to do that.

@ramoka178
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Swagger ModelValidation is still failing as this PR aimed to solve such errors. Please fix these too.

@openapi-pipeline-app openapi-pipeline-app bot removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Oct 22, 2024
@openapi-pipeline-app openapi-pipeline-app bot added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Oct 23, 2024
@UrosKrsticMIPerf
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Swagger ModelValidation is still failing as this PR aimed to solve such errors. Please fix these too.

ModelValidation passing now, the rest of changes are not part of my PR and my code change so they have been reverted.
image

@ramoka178
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approving as these are existing ones

@ramoka178 ramoka178 added the ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review label Oct 23, 2024
@openapi-pipeline-app openapi-pipeline-app bot removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Oct 23, 2024
@UrosKrsticMIPerf UrosKrsticMIPerf merged commit 4d5d694 into Azure:release-sql-Microsoft.Sql-2024-08-01-preview Oct 23, 2024
ericshape pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2025
* adding MemorySizeInGb to swagger #30912

* adding #31080 and #31062

* prettier fix

* prettiercheck fix
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ARMReview ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review resource-manager SQL

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants