Skip to content

Comments

Custom node image upgrade type in UpdateRun#28470

Merged
serbrech merged 2 commits intoAzure:dev-aks-fleet-2024-05-02-previewfrom
minhng22:nguyenmin/nodeimagecustom
Apr 9, 2024
Merged

Custom node image upgrade type in UpdateRun#28470
serbrech merged 2 commits intoAzure:dev-aks-fleet-2024-05-02-previewfrom
minhng22:nguyenmin/nodeimagecustom

Conversation

@minhng22
Copy link
Member

ARM (Control Plane) API Specification Update Pull Request

Tip

Overwhelmed by all this guidance? See the Getting help section at the bottom of this PR description.

Note

As of January 2024 there is no PR assignee. This is expected. See https://aka.ms/azsdk/pr-arm-review.

PR review workflow diagram

Please understand this diagram before proceeding. It explains how to get your PR approved & merged.

diagram

Click here to see the details of Step 1, Breaking Changes review

If you are in purview of Step 1 of the diagram, follow the Breaking Changes review process.
IMPORTANT! This applies even if you believe your PR was mislabeled, for any reason, including tool failure.

Click here to see the details of Step 2, ARM review

See https://aka.ms/azsdk/pr-arm-review.

Click here to see the diagram footnotes

Diagram footnotes

[1] See ARM review queue (for PR merge queues, see [2]).
[2] public repo merge queue, private repo merge queue (for ARM review queue, [1])
The ARM reviewer on-call engineer visits the merge queue twice a day, so the approximate ETA for merges is 12 - 24 hours.

Purpose of this PR

What's the purpose of this PR? Check the specific option that applies. This is mandatory!

  • New resource provider.
  • New API version for an existing resource provider. (If API spec is not defined in TypeSpec, the PR should have been generated using OpenAPI Hub).
  • Update existing version for a new feature. (This is applicable only when you are revising a private preview API version.)
  • Update existing version to fix OpenAPI spec quality issues in S360.
  • Other, please clarify:
    • edit this with your clarification

Due diligence checklist

To merge this PR, you must go through the following checklist and confirm you understood
and followed the instructions by checking all the boxes:

  • I confirm this PR is modifying Azure Resource Manager (ARM) related specifications, and not data plane related specifications.
  • I have reviewed following Resource Provider guidelines, including
    ARM resource provider contract and
    REST guidelines (estimated time: 4 hours).
    I understand this is required before I can proceed to the diagram Step 2, "ARM API changes review", for this PR.

Additional information

Viewing API changes

For convenient view of the API changes made by this PR, refer to the URLs provided in the table
in the Generated ApiView comment added to this PR. You can use ApiView to show API versions diff.

Suppressing failures

If one or multiple validation error/warning suppression(s) is detected in your PR, please follow the
suppressions guide to get approval.

Getting help

  • First, please carefully read through this PR description, from top to bottom. Please fill out the Purpose of this PR and Due diligence checklist.
  • To understand what you must do next to merge this PR, see the Next Steps to Merge comment. It will appear within few minutes of submitting this PR and will continue to be up-to-date with current PR state.
  • For guidance on fixing this PR CI check failures, see the hyperlinks provided in given failure
    and https://aka.ms/ci-fix.
  • For help with PR workflow diagram Step 2 (ARM review), see https://aka.ms/azsdk/pr-arm-review.
  • If the PR CI checks appear to be stuck in queued state, please add a comment with contents /azp run.
    This should result in a new comment denoting a PR validation pipeline has started and the checks should be updated after few minutes.
  • If the help provided by the previous points is not enough, post to https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel and link to this PR.

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Mar 26, 2024

Next Steps to Merge

✅ All automated merging requirements have been met! To get your PR merged, see https://aka.ms/azsdk/specreview/merge.

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Mar 26, 2024

Swagger Validation Report

️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️❌Breaking Change(Cross-Version): 4 Errors, 7 Warnings failed [Detail]
Compared specs (v0.10.7) new version base version
fleets.json 2024-05-02-preview(0f5f773) 2023-10-15(main)
fleets.json 2024-05-02-preview(0f5f773) 2024-02-02-preview(main)

The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest stable version:

Rule Message
1029 - ReadonlyPropertyChanged The read only property has changed from 'true' to 'false'.
New: fleet/preview/2024-05-02-preview/fleets.json#L1923:9
Old: fleet/stable/2023-10-15/fleets.json#L1747:9
1029 - ReadonlyPropertyChanged The read only property has changed from 'true' to 'false'.
New: fleet/preview/2024-05-02-preview/fleets.json#L1969:9
Old: fleet/stable/2023-10-15/fleets.json#L1794:9
1029 - ReadonlyPropertyChanged The read only property has changed from 'true' to 'false'.
New: fleet/preview/2024-05-02-preview/fleets.json#L2619:9
Old: fleet/stable/2023-10-15/fleets.json#L2340:9
1029 - ReadonlyPropertyChanged The read only property has changed from 'true' to 'false'.
New: fleet/preview/2024-05-02-preview/fleets.json#L2197:9
Old: fleet/stable/2023-10-15/fleets.json#L2019:9


The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest preview version:

Rule Message
⚠️ 1019 - RemovedEnumValue The new version is removing enum value(s) 'ControlPlaneOnly' from the old version.
New: fleet/preview/2024-05-02-preview/fleets.json#L2301:9
Old: fleet/preview/2024-02-02-preview/fleets.json#L2322:9
⚠️ 1019 - RemovedEnumValue The new version is removing enum value(s) 'ControlPlaneOnly' from the old version.
New: fleet/preview/2024-05-02-preview/fleets.json#L2314:5
Old: fleet/preview/2024-02-02-preview/fleets.json#L2335:5
⚠️ 1029 - ReadonlyPropertyChanged The read only property has changed from 'true' to 'false'.
New: fleet/preview/2024-05-02-preview/fleets.json#L1923:9
Old: fleet/preview/2024-02-02-preview/fleets.json#L1941:9
⚠️ 1029 - ReadonlyPropertyChanged The read only property has changed from 'true' to 'false'.
New: fleet/preview/2024-05-02-preview/fleets.json#L1969:9
Old: fleet/preview/2024-02-02-preview/fleets.json#L1988:9
⚠️ 1029 - ReadonlyPropertyChanged The read only property has changed from 'true' to 'false'.
New: fleet/preview/2024-05-02-preview/fleets.json#L2619:9
Old: fleet/preview/2024-02-02-preview/fleets.json#L2630:9
⚠️ 1029 - ReadonlyPropertyChanged The read only property has changed from 'true' to 'false'.
New: fleet/preview/2024-05-02-preview/fleets.json#L2197:9
Old: fleet/preview/2024-02-02-preview/fleets.json#L2217:9
⚠️ 1044 - XmsLongRunningOperationChanged The new version has a different 'x-ms-longrunning-operation' value than the previous one.
New: fleet/preview/2024-05-02-preview/fleets.json#L1197:7
Old: fleet/preview/2024-02-02-preview/fleets.json#L1197:7
️️✔️LintDiff succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for LintDiff.
Compared specs (v2.2.0) new version base version
default default(0f5f773) default(dev-aks-fleet-2024-05-02-preview)
️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️❌TypeSpecAPIView: 0 Errors, 1 Warnings failed [Detail]
Rule Message
⚠️ Failed to generate TypeSpec APIView. Please check the detail log and make sure TypeSpec compiler version is the latest. "How to fix":"Check the detailed log and verify if the TypeSpec emitter is able to create API review file for the changes in PR."
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Summary.
️️✔️Automated merging requirements met succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Mar 26, 2024

Swagger Generation Artifacts

️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]

Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]

Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

️❌ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 failed [Detail]

Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]

Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

️️✔️ azure-powershell succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Mar 26, 2024

Generated ApiView

Language Package Name ApiView Link
Go sdk/resourcemanager/containerservicefleet/armcontainerservicefleet https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/725977798127472fa8def873f4c6c9aa?revisionId=3a5d9956127b45479b289cef18758460
Java azure-resourcemanager-containerservicefleet https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/8422e73bfd5d45efb77d0cf066bec1a0?revisionId=be8a39d9d09c43e1877e746cd7f5234c
JavaScript @azure/arm-containerservicefleet https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/65c668ceaa2346708bf1e479b7f6b79b?revisionId=125dd3a6d25b41508153c44879116e17

@serbrech serbrech merged commit 7c7ac48 into Azure:dev-aks-fleet-2024-05-02-preview Apr 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

resource-manager TypeSpec Authored with TypeSpec

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants