Synapse: fix enum name for synapse sensitivityLabelSource#27595
Synapse: fix enum name for synapse sensitivityLabelSource#27595wuxu92 wants to merge 1 commit intoAzure:mainfrom
Conversation
Next Steps to MergeNext steps that must be taken to merge this PR:
|
Swagger Validation Report
|
| compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.4)] | new version | base version |
|---|---|---|
| sqlPool.json | 2021-06-01(d7e3cbb) | 2021-06-01(main) |
| Rule | Message |
|---|---|
1047 - XmsEnumChanged |
The new version has a different x-ms-enum 'name' than the previous one. New: Microsoft.Synapse/stable/2021-06-01/sqlPool.json#L2124:11 Old: Microsoft.Synapse/stable/2021-06-01/sqlPool.json#L2124:11 |
1047 - XmsEnumChanged |
The new version has a different x-ms-enum 'name' than the previous one. New: Microsoft.Synapse/stable/2021-06-01/sqlPool.json#L2222:11 Old: Microsoft.Synapse/stable/2021-06-01/sqlPool.json#L2222:11 |
1047 - XmsEnumChanged |
The new version has a different x-ms-enum 'name' than the previous one. New: Microsoft.Synapse/stable/2021-06-01/sqlPool.json#L2391:11 Old: Microsoft.Synapse/stable/2021-06-01/sqlPool.json#L2391:11 |
1047 - XmsEnumChanged |
The new version has a different x-ms-enum 'name' than the previous one. New: Microsoft.Synapse/stable/2021-06-01/sqlPool.json#L2469:11 Old: Microsoft.Synapse/stable/2021-06-01/sqlPool.json#L2469:11 |
️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️️✔️LintDiff succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for LintDiff.
️⚠️Avocado: 1 Warnings warning [Detail]
| Rule | Message |
|---|---|
| The default tag contains multiple API versions swaggers. readme: specification/synapse/resource-manager/readme.md tag: specification/synapse/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-composite-v2 |
️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passed for PoliCheck.
️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Summary.
️️✔️Automated merging requirements met succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
Generated ApiView
|
|
Please address or respond to feedback from the ARM API reviewer. |
|
Hi, @wuxu92. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove |
|
Hi, @wuxu92. The PR will be closed since the PR has no update for 28 days. If you still need the PR review to proceed, please reopen it and @ mention PR assignee. |
ARM (Control Plane) API Specification Update Pull Request
Tip
Overwhelmed by all this guidance? See the
Getting helpsection at the bottom of this PR description.Note
As of January 2024 there is no PR assignee. This is expected. See https://aka.ms/azsdk/pr-arm-review.
PR review workflow diagram
Please understand this diagram before proceeding. It explains how to get your PR approved & merged.
Click here to see the details of Step 1
Breaking changes review (Diagram Step 1)
If the automation determines you have breaking changes, i.e. Step 1 from the diagram applies to you,
you must follow the breaking changes process.
IMPORTANT This applies even if:
Such claims must be reviewed, and the process is the same.
Click here to see the details of Step 2
ARM API changes review (Diagram Step 2)
Click here to see the diagram footnotes
Diagram footnotes
[1] See ARM review queue (for PR merge queues, see [2]).
[2] public repo merge queue, private repo merge queue (for ARM review queue, [1])
The ARM reviewer on-call engineer visits the merge queue twice a day, so the approximate ETA for merges is 12 - 24 hours.
Purpose of this PR
What's the purpose of this PR? Check the specific option that applies. This is mandatory!
Due diligence checklist
To merge this PR, you must go through the following checklist and confirm you understood
and followed the instructions by checking all the boxes:
ARM resource provider contract and
REST guidelines (estimated time: 4 hours).
I understand this is required before I can proceed to the diagram Step 2, "ARM API changes review", for this PR.
Additional information
Viewing API changes
For convenient view of the API changes made by this PR, refer to the URLs provided in the table
in the
Generated ApiViewcomment added to this PR. You can use ApiView to show API versions diff.Suppressing failures
If one or multiple validation error/warning suppression(s) is detected in your PR, please follow the
suppressions guide to get approval.
Getting help
Purpose of this PRandDue diligence checklist.Next Steps to Mergecomment. It will appear within few minutes of submitting this PR and will continue to be up-to-date with current PR state.and https://aka.ms/ci-fix.
queuedstate, please add a comment with contents/azp run.This should result in a new comment denoting a
PR validation pipelinehas started and the checks should be updated after few minutes.This PR is similar to what #24742 did, and fixes the issue causing hashicorp/pandora#1508.