Skip to content

Azure Active Directory change to Microsoft Entra ID#26815

Merged
rkmanda merged 3 commits into
Azure:mainfrom
apoorvasingh130:main
Nov 28, 2023
Merged

Azure Active Directory change to Microsoft Entra ID#26815
rkmanda merged 3 commits into
Azure:mainfrom
apoorvasingh130:main

Conversation

@apoorvasingh130
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

ARM (Control Plane) API Specification Update Pull Request

PR review workflow diagram

Please understand this diagram before proceeding. It explains how to get your PR approved & merged.

diagram

Click here to see the details of Step 1

Breaking changes review (Diagram Step 1)

If the automation determines you have breaking changes, i.e. Step 1 from the diagram applies to you,
you must follow the breaking changes process.
IMPORTANT This applies even if:

  • The tool fails while it shouldn't, e.g. due to runtime exception, or incorrect detection of breaking changes.
  • You believe there is no need for you to request breaking change approval, for any reason.
    Such claims must be reviewed, and the process is the same.
Click here to see the details of Step 2

ARM API changes review (Diagram Step 2)

  • If this PR is in purview of ARM review then automation will add the ARMReview label.
  • If you want to force ARM review, add the label yourself.
  • Proceed according to the diagram at the top of this comment.
Click here to see the diagram footnotes

Diagram footnotes

[1] ARM review queue (for merge queues, see [4])
The PRs are processed by time opened, ascending. Your PR may show up on 2nd or later page.
If you addressed Step 1 from the diagram and your PR is not showing up in the queue, ensure the label ARMChangesRequested
is removed from your PR. This should cause the label WaitForARMFeedback to be added.
[2] https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel
[3] List of SDK breaking changes approvers in pinned Teams announcement
[4] public repo merge queue, private repo merge queue (for ARM review queue, [1])

If you need further help with anything, see Getting help section below.

Purpose of this PR

What's the purpose of this PR? Check all that apply. This is mandatory!

  • New API version. (If API spec is not defined in TypeSpec, the PR should have been generated using OpenAPI Hub).
  • Update existing version for a new feature. (This is applicable only when you are revising a private preview API version.)
  • Update existing version to fix swagger quality issues in S360.
  • Other, please clarify:
    • edit this with your clarification

Due diligence checklist

To merge this PR, you must go through the following checklist and confirm you understood
and followed the instructions by checking all the boxes:

  • I confirm this PR is modifying Azure Resource Manager (ARM) related specifications, and not data plane related specifications.
  • I have reviewed following Resource Provider guidelines, including
    ARM resource provider contract and
    REST guidelines (estimated time: 4 hours).
    I understand this is required before I can proceed to the Diagram Step 2, "ARM API changes Review", for this PR.

Additional information

Viewing API changes

For convenient view of the API changes made by this PR, refer to the URLs provided in the table
in the Generated ApiView comment added to this PR. You can use ApiView to show API versions diff.

Suppressing failures

If one or multiple validation error/warning suppression(s) is detected in your PR, please follow the
Swagger-Suppression-Process
to get approval.

Getting help

  • For general PR approval workflow, see the diagram at the top of this comment.
  • For guidance on fixing this PR CI check failures, see the hyperlinks provided in given failure
    and https://aka.ms/ci-fix.
  • If the PR CI checks appear to be stuck in queued state, please add a comment with contents /azp run.
    This should result in a new comment denoting a PR validation pipeline has started and the checks should be updated after few minutes.
  • If the help provided by the previous points is not enough, post to https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel and link to this PR.

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openapi-pipeline-app Bot commented Nov 22, 2023

Next Steps to Merge

✔️ All automated merging requirements have been met! Refer to step 4 in the PR workflow diagram (even if your PR is for data plane, not ARM).

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openapi-pipeline-app Bot commented Nov 22, 2023

Swagger Validation Report

️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.4)] new version base version
logz.json 2020-10-01-preview(d5ef81b) 2020-10-01-preview(main)
logz.json 2022-01-01-preview(d5ef81b) 2022-01-01-preview(main)
logz.json 2020-10-01(d5ef81b) 2020-10-01(main)
️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
compared tags (via openapi-validator v2.1.6) new version base version
package-2022-01-01-preview package-2022-01-01-preview(d5ef81b) package-2022-01-01-preview(main)
package-2020-10-01-preview package-2020-10-01-preview(d5ef81b) package-2020-10-01-preview(main)
package-2020-10-01 package-2020-10-01(d5ef81b) package-2020-10-01(main)

The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

Rule Message
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'monitorName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L29
OperationIdNounVerb Per the Noun_Verb convention for Operation Ids, the noun 'Monitors' should not appear after the underscore. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L35
OperationsApiSchemaUsesCommonTypes Operations API path must follow the schema provided in the common types.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L96
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'monitorName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L203
PatchIdentityProperty The patch operation body parameter schema should contain property 'identity'.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L332
DeleteResponseCodes Long-running delete operations must have responses with 202, 204 and default return codes. They also must have no other response codes.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L363
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'monitorName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L420
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'monitorName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L468
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'ruleSetName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L468
PutResponseCodes Synchronous and long-running PUT operations must have responses with 200, 201 and default return codes. They also must not have other response codes.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L469
DeleteResponseCodes An async DELETE operation must set ''x-ms-long-running-operation' : true'.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L577
LroExtension Operations with a 202 response must specify x-ms-long-running-operation: true.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L577
XMSLongRunningOperationProperty If an operation's (PUT/POST/PATCH/DELETE) responses have Location or Azure-AsyncOperation headers then it MUST have the property x-ms-long-running-operation set to true
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L613
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'monitorName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L636
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'monitorName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L684
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'configurationName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L684
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'monitorName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L804
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'monitorName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L852
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'subAccountName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L852
DeleteResponseCodes Long-running delete operations must have responses with 202, 204 and default return codes. They also must have no other response codes.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L965
PatchIdentityProperty The patch operation body parameter schema should contain property 'identity'.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L1049
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'monitorName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L1081
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'subAccountName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L1081
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'monitorName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L1132
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'subAccountName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L1132
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'ruleSetName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L1132
PutResponseCodes Synchronous and long-running PUT operations must have responses with 200, 201 and default return codes. They also must not have other response codes.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L1133
DeleteResponseCodes An async DELETE operation must set ''x-ms-long-running-operation' : true'.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L1247
LroExtension Operations with a 202 response must specify x-ms-long-running-operation: true.
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L1247
XMSLongRunningOperationProperty If an operation's (PUT/POST/PATCH/DELETE) responses have Location or Azure-AsyncOperation headers then it MUST have the property x-ms-long-running-operation set to true
Location: Microsoft.Logz/preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json#L1286
️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passed for PoliCheck.
️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Summary.
️️✔️Automated merging requirements met succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openapi-pipeline-app Bot commented Nov 22, 2023

Swagger Generation Artifacts

️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
 Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
️️✔️SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Breaking Changes Tracking



️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
  • ⚠️Warning [Logs] Generate from eda8ebd409edc0931e70a83c8cf67938a200f77c. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: azure-devtools 1.2.1 does not provide the extra 'ci-tools'
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: azure-devtools 1.2.1 does not provide the extra 'ci-tools'
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
    command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
    cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] notice
    cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice New major version of npm available! 9.8.1 -> 10.2.4
    cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v10.2.4>
    cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g npm@10.2.4` to update!
    cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice
  • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-logz [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
    info	[Changelog]
️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]
  • ⚠️Warning [Logs] Generate from eda8ebd409edc0931e70a83c8cf67938a200f77c. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
    cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] A new release of pip is available: 23.0.1 -> 23.3.1
    cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] To update, run: pip install --upgrade pip
    cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] A new release of pip is available: 23.0.1 -> 23.3.1
    cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] To update, run: pip install --upgrade pip
    command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
  • ️✔️azure-resourcemanager-logz [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
  • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs] Generate from eda8ebd409edc0931e70a83c8cf67938a200f77c. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
    command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
  • ️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/logz/armlogz [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
    info	[Changelog] ### Other Changes
    info	[Changelog]
    info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 0 additive change(s).
️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
  • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs] Generate from eda8ebd409edc0931e70a83c8cf67938a200f77c. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
    warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
    command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json
  • ️✔️@azure/arm-logz [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
    info	[Changelog]
    error	breakingChangeTracking is enabled, but version or changelogItem is not found in output.
️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]
  • ⚠️Warning [Logs] Generate from eda8ebd409edc0931e70a83c8cf67938a200f77c. Schema Automation 14.0.0
    command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm notice
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm notice New major version of npm available! 8.19.4 -> 10.2.4
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v10.2.4>
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g npm@10.2.4` to update!
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm notice
    warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
    command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
️❌ azure-powershell failed [Detail]
  • Pipeline Framework Failed [Logs] Generate from eda8ebd409edc0931e70a83c8cf67938a200f77c. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
    command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
    SSL error: syscall failure: Broken pipe
    Error: SSL error: syscall failure: Broken pipe
  • ️✔️Az.logz.DefaultTag [View full logs
    error	Fatal error: SSL error: syscall failure: Broken pipe
    error	The following packages are still pending:
    error		Az.logz.DefaultTag
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openapi-pipeline-app Bot commented Nov 22, 2023

Generated ApiView

Language Package Name ApiView Link
Go sdk/resourcemanager/logz/armlogz https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/61fd78369b73415b8b454b3bce018c67
Java azure-resourcemanager-logz There is no API change compared with the previous version
JavaScript @azure/arm-logz https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/cda572ee6a7c408689bf9351ddbecab2
Swagger Microsoft.Logz https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/7777f393415c4ddeabf200da7a34414b

@AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added the ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test label Nov 22, 2023
@mukundnigam mukundnigam added the ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review label Nov 24, 2023
@openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot Bot removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Nov 24, 2023
@apoorvasingh130
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/pr RequestMerge

@rkmanda rkmanda merged commit 1631971 into Azure:main Nov 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ARMReview ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review IDCDevDiv Liftr Marketplace-Liftr RPs ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test resource-manager RPaaS

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants