Fix notebook vm lintingerror 2591448

[ragovada]

ARM (Control Plane) API Specification Update Pull Request

PR review workflow diagram

Please understand this diagram before proceeding. It explains how to get your PR approved & merged.

[1] ARM review queue (for merge queues, see [4])
The PRs are processed by time opened, ascending. Your PR may show up on 2nd or later page.
If you addressed Step 1 from the diagram and your PR is not showing up in the queue, ensure the label ARMChangesRequested
is removed from your PR. This should cause the label WaitForARMFeedback to be added.
[2] https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel
[3] List of SDK breaking changes approvers in pinned Teams announcement
[4] public repo merge queue, private repo merge queue (for ARM review queue, [1])

If you need further help with anything, see Getting help section below.

Purpose of this PR

What's the purpose of this PR? Check all that apply. This is mandatory!

• New API version. (Such PR should have been generated with OpenAPI Hub, per this wiki doc.)
• Update existing version for a new feature. (This is applicable only when you are revising a private preview API version.)
• Update existing version to fix swagger quality issues in S360.
• Other, please clarify:
  • edit this with your clarification

Due diligence checklist

To merge this PR, you must go through the following checklist and confirm you understood
and followed the instructions by checking all the boxes:

• I confirm this PR is modifying Azure Resource Manager (ARM) related specifications, and not data plane related specifications.
• I have reviewed following Resource Provider guidelines, including
  ARM resource provider contract and
  REST guidelines (estimated time: 4 hours).
  I understand this is required before I can proceed to Step 2, "ARM Review", for this PR.

Breaking changes review (Step 1)

• If the automation determines you have breaking changes, i.e. Step 1 from the diagram applies to you,
  you must follow the breaking changes process.
  IMPORTANT This applies even if:
  • The tool fails while it shouldn't, e.g. due to runtime exception, or incorrect detection of breaking changes.
  • You believe there is no need for you to request breaking change approval, for any reason.
    Such claims must be reviewed, and the process is the same.

ARM API changes review (Step 2)

• If this PR is in purview of ARM review then automation will add the ARMReview label.
• If you want to force ARM review, add the label yourself.
• Proceed according to the diagram at the top of this comment.

Viewing API changes

For convenient view of the API changes made by this PR, refer to the URLs provided in the table
in the Generated ApiView comment added to this PR. You can use ApiView to show API versions diff.

Suppressing failures

If one or multiple validation error/warning suppression(s) is detected in your PR, please follow the
Swagger-Suppression-Process
to get approval.

Getting help

• For general PR approval workflow, see the diagram at the top of this comment.
• For guidance on fixing this PR CI check failures, see the hyperlinks provided in given failure
  and https://aka.ms/ci-fix.
• If the help provided by the previous points is not enough, post to https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel and link to this PR.

[openapi-workflow-bot]

Hi @ragovada! For review efficiency consideration, when creating a new API version, it is required to place API specs of the base version in the first commit, and push new version updates into successive commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version.
For more details refer to the wiki.

[openapi-workflow-bot]

Please address or respond to feedback from the ARM API reviewer.
When you are ready to continue the ARM API review, please remove the ARMChangesRequested label.
This will notify the reviewer to have another look.
If the feedback provided needs further discussion, please use this Teams channel to post your questions - aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel.
Please include [ARM Query] in the title of your question to indicate that it is ARM-related.