Adding Swagger for AmlServerless RPaaS #25235
Conversation
…version preview/2023-04-25-preview (Azure#24970) * update name pattern and change instanceview * update examples * add ExtensionsResourceInstanceView * change extensions instance view * undo ref change * update times in examples * Remove 04-25-2024 from the public specs repo. Will add these specs to the private repo * Update readme.md * Update readme.md --------- Co-authored-by: Ved Kale <vedkale@microsoft.com>
* adding new folder 2023-04-02 * readme section for 2023-04-02 * changing version number in folder 2023-04-02 * Adding new disk property - LastOwnershipUpdateTime (Azure#25039) * Added lastownership field * Added to existing DIsk_Get.json example * Swagger changes for elastic san import and export feature (Azure#24953) * swagger changes for elastic san import and export feature * fixing API version in swagger examples * adding reference to examples * fixing examples * Dev/carloshehe/last ownership update time (Azure#25160) * Added lastownership field * Added to existing DIsk_Get.json example * New description * Using Vikram's suggestion for description * Fixed bad casing --------- Co-authored-by: carlos6125 <140001684+carlos6125@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: PrambMS <136007667+PrambMS@users.noreply.github.com>
* New AO5GC 1.0 service - 2023-05-15-preview * Addressed the Swagger LintDiff errors * Addressed the Swagger ModelValidation errors * Addressed long running operation LintDiff errors * Formatted the *.tsp files * Removed the common.json and added the parameters to the networkfunction.json * Updated the Type Script to address the Swagger API validations * Addressed the validation errors * Updated the examples and formatted the *.tsp files * Update specification/mpcnetworkfunction/resource-manager/readme.typescript.md Co-authored-by: Qiaoqiao Zhang <55688292+qiaozha@users.noreply.github.com> * Update specification/mpcnetworkfunction/mpcnetworkfunction.Management/tspconfig.yaml Co-authored-by: Mike Harder <mharder@microsoft.com> * Updated the common types version to v3 * Updated the networkfunction TypeSpec file to the latest version and generated the Swagger API --------- Co-authored-by: Qiaoqiao Zhang <55688292+qiaozha@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Mike Harder <mharder@microsoft.com>
…add version stable/2023-07-01 (Azure#25151) * Adds base for updating Microsoft.ContainerService/aks from version stable/2023-06-01 to version 2023-07-01 * Updates readme * Updates API version in new specs and examples * feat: add range min/max for custom node config GA changes for 2023-07-01 API (Azure#25068) Co-authored-by: Mikolaj Umanski <mumanski@microsoft.com> * update readmes (Azure#25048) * add force upgrade option (Azure#25100) * add force upgrade option * update msg --------- Co-authored-by: Wenjun Gao <wenjungao@microsoft.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Mikołaj Umański <mik.umanski@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Mikolaj Umanski <mumanski@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: Wenjun Gao <wenjungaoat@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Wenjun Gao <wenjungao@microsoft.com>
- Fixes Azure#24791 - Fixes Azure#24790 - Ensures developers can successfully work on both Linux and Windows - Consistent with other repos like `microsoft/typespec` and `azure/azure-sdk-for-js` - Required for node-based tools like `tsp format` which assume LF
* change sessionId type from int to string * modify related code
- Fixes Azure#25212 - Files were committed with CRLF instead of LF - Should be prevented going forward due to settings in `.gitattributes`, but clients can always force add files with CRLF - Related to Azure#24817 - Issue seen before in Azure#4746 and Azure#3786
…4755) * added july 2023 api version * fixed few changes * Prettier * Avocado * Updated examples * fixed examples * added changes * addressed review comments * addressed review comment * fixed build issue * fixed model validation error * addressed comment * addressed review comments * few minor changes * added minor changes * prettier * addressed review comments
* `securitycenter` fix yaml * fix path in readme.md
|
Hi, @haritha-bendapudi! Thank you for your pull request. To help get your PR merged: Generated ApiView comment added to this PR. You can use ApiView to show API versions diff. |
|
Hi, @haritha-bendapudi. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove |
Next Steps to MergeNext steps that must be taken to merge this PR:
|
|
Hi, @haritha-bendapudi. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove |
|
Hi, @haritha-bendapudi. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove |
|
Hi, @haritha-bendapudi. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove |
3 similar comments
|
Hi, @haritha-bendapudi. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove |
|
Hi, @haritha-bendapudi. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove |
|
Hi, @haritha-bendapudi. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove |
|
Hi, @haritha-bendapudi. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove |
6 similar comments
|
Hi, @haritha-bendapudi. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove |
|
Hi, @haritha-bendapudi. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove |
|
Hi, @haritha-bendapudi. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove |
|
Hi, @haritha-bendapudi. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove |
|
Hi, @haritha-bendapudi. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove |
|
Hi, @haritha-bendapudi. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove |
|
Hi, @haritha-bendapudi. The PR will be closed since the PR has no update for 28 days. If you still need the PR review to proceed, please reopen it and @ mention PR assignee. |
ARM (Control Plane) API Specification Update Pull Request
PR review workflow diagram
Please understand this diagram before proceeding. It explains how to get your PR approved & merged.
[1] public repo review queue, private repo review queue
The PRs are processed by time opened, ascending. Your PR may show up on 2nd or later page.
If you addressed Step 1 from the diagram and your PR is not showing up in the queue, ensure the label
ARMChangesRequestedis removed from your PR. This should cause the label
WaitForARMFeedbackto be added.[2] https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel
[3] List of SDK breaking changes approvers in pinned Teams announcement
[4] public repo merge queue, private repo merge queue
If you need further help with anything, see
Getting helpsection below.Purpose of this PR
What's the purpose of this PR? Check all that apply. This is mandatory!
Due diligence checklist
To merge this PR, you must go through the following checklist and confirm you understood
and followed the instructions by checking all the boxes:
ARM resource provider contract and
REST guidelines (estimated time: 4 hours).
I understand this is required before I can proceed to Step 2, "ARM Review", for this PR.
Breaking changes review (Step 1)
you must follow the breaking changes process.
IMPORTANT This applies even if:
Such claims must be reviewed, and the process is the same.
ARM API changes review (Step 2)
ARMReviewlabel.Getting help
and https://aka.ms/ci-fix.