[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.DataReplication to add version preview/2021-02-16-preview by minhsuanlee · Pull Request #24903 · Azure/azure-rest-api-specs

minhsuanlee · 2023-07-19T23:36:02Z

This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.

ARM (Control Plane) API Specification Update Pull Request

PR review workflow diagram

Please understand this diagram before proceeding. It explains how to get your PR approved & merged.

Purpose of this PR

What's the purpose of this PR? Check all that apply. This is mandatory!

New API version. (Such PR should have been generated with OpenAPI Hub, per this wiki doc.)
Update existing version for a new feature. (This is applicable only when you are revising a private preview API version.)
Update existing version to fix swagger quality issues in S360.
Other, please clarify:
- edit this with your clarification

Due diligence checklist

To merge this PR, you must go through the following checklist and confirm you understood
and followed the instructions by checking all the boxes:

I have reviewed the general guidance on the spec PR review process: https://aka.ms/specprreview.
I confirm this PR is modifying Azure Resource Manager (ARM) related specifications, and not data-plane related specifications.
I commit to follow the Breaking Change Policy.
I have reviewed following Resource Provider guidelines, including
ARM resource provider contract and
REST guidelines (estimated time: 4 hours).
I understand this is required before I can request review from an ARM API Review board.

ARM API changes review

If you want for the ARM team to review this PR, you must add the ARMReview label.
The automation may automatically add the ARMReview label, if appropriate.
If this happens, proceed according to guidance given in GitHub comments also added by the automation.

Breaking change review

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy,
follow the process outlined in the High-level Breaking Change Process doc.

Getting help

For guidance on fixing this PR CI check failures, see the hyperlinks provided in given failure
and https://aka.ms/ci-fix.
For additional help, see https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/spectools.

openapi-workflow-bot · 2023-07-19T23:36:05Z

Hi, @minhsuanlee! Thank you for your pull request. To help get your PR merged:

Ensure you reviewed the checklists in the PR description.

Know that PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR review and approval.

For convenient view of the API changes made by this PR, refer to the URLs provided in the table in the Generated ApiView comment added to this PR. You can use ApiView to show API versions diff.

openapi-pipeline-app · 2023-07-19T23:36:05Z

Swagger Validation Report

️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

There are no breaking changes.

️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

There are no breaking changes.

️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

There is no credential detected.

️❌LintDiff: 16 Errors, 177 Warnings failed [Detail]

compared tags (via openapi-validator v2.1.3)	new version	base version
package-2021-02-16-preview	package-2021-02-16-preview(5ef4eea)	default(main)

[must fix]The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:

Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

Rule	Message	Related RPC [For API reviewers]
`❌` LroErrorContent	Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L135
`❌` LroErrorContent	Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L205
`❌` LroErrorContent	Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L758
`❌` LroErrorContent	Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L834
`❌` LroErrorContent	Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L896
`❌` LroErrorContent	Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L1192
`❌` LroErrorContent	Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L1262
`❌` LroErrorContent	Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L1519
`❌` LroErrorContent	Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L1595
`❌` LroErrorContent	Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L1735
`❌` LroErrorContent	Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L2067
`❌` LroErrorContent	Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L2137
`❌` OperationsApiResponseSchema	The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.DataReplication/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L2349
`❌` LroErrorContent	Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L2536
`❌` LroErrorContent	Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L2612
`❌` LroErrorContent	Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L2674
⚠️ PreviewVersionOverOneYear	The API version:2021-02-16-preview having been in a preview state over one year , please move it to GA or retire. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L6
⚠️ ParameterNotUsingCommonTypes	Not using the common-types defined parameter 'subscriptionId'. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L24
⚠️ ParameterNotUsingCommonTypes	Not using the common-types defined parameter 'resourceGroupName'. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L24
⚠️ ParameterNotUsingCommonTypes	Not using the common-types defined parameter 'api-version'. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L24
⚠️ ParameterNotUsingCommonTypes	Not using the common-types defined parameter 'subscriptionId'. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L84
⚠️ ParameterNotUsingCommonTypes	Not using the common-types defined parameter 'resourceGroupName'. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L84
⚠️ ParameterNotUsingCommonTypes	Not using the common-types defined parameter 'api-version'. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L84
⚠️ ParameterNotUsingCommonTypes	Not using the common-types defined parameter 'subscriptionId'. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L159
⚠️ ParameterNotUsingCommonTypes	Not using the common-types defined parameter 'resourceGroupName'. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L159
⚠️ ParameterNotUsingCommonTypes	Not using the common-types defined parameter 'api-version'. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L159
⚠️ ParameterNotUsingCommonTypes	Not using the common-types defined parameter 'subscriptionId'. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L231
⚠️ ParameterNotUsingCommonTypes	Not using the common-types defined parameter 'resourceGroupName'. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L231
⚠️ ParameterNotUsingCommonTypes	Not using the common-types defined parameter 'api-version'. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L231
⚠️ ParameterNotUsingCommonTypes	Not using the common-types defined parameter 'operationId'. Location: Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json#L285

️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for Avocado.

️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️⚠️~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]

API Test is not triggered due to precheck failure. Check pipeline log for details.

️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️️✔️CadlAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️️✔️TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for ModelValidation.

️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for SemanticValidation.

️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passed for PoliCheck.

️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for PrettierCheck.

️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for SpellCheck.

️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).

️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for CadlValidation.

️️✔️TypeSpec Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for TypeSpec Validation.

️❌PR Summary: 0 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]

️️✔️All merging requirements met succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

_{Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?}

openapi-pipeline-app · 2023-07-19T23:36:06Z

Swagger Generation Artifacts

️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

 Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account.

️️✔️SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Breaking Changes Tracking

️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]

⚠️Warning [Logs] Generate from 281e0091410ced102f2890f3b34ef57276749390. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh]
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice New minor version of npm available! 9.5.1 -> 9.8.1
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v9.8.1>
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g npm@9.8.1` to update!
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice

️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-azuresiterecovery [View full logs] [Preview SDK Changes]
- azure-mgmt-azuresiterecovery-1.0.0b1.zip
- azure_mgmt_azuresiterecovery-1.0.0b1-py3-none-any.whl
```
info	[Changelog]   - Initial Release
```

️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]

⚠️Warning [Logs] Generate from 281e0091410ced102f2890f3b34ef57276749390. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] A new release of pip is available: 23.0.1 -> 23.2
cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] To update, run: pip install --upgrade pip
cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] A new release of pip is available: 23.0.1 -> 23.2
cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] To update, run: pip install --upgrade pip
command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json

️✔️azure-resourcemanager-azuresiterecovery [View full logs] [Preview SDK Changes]

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️✔️Succeeded [Logs] Generate from 281e0091410ced102f2890f3b34ef57276749390. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json

️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/azuresiterecovery/armazuresiterecovery [View full logs] [Preview SDK Changes]
```
info	[Changelog] This is a new package
info	[Changelog]
```

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️✔️Succeeded [Logs] Generate from 281e0091410ced102f2890f3b34ef57276749390. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json

️✔️@azure/arm-azuresiterecovery [View full logs] [Preview SDK Changes]
- azure-arm-azuresiterecovery-1.0.0-beta.1.tgz
```
info	[Changelog]
error	breakingChangeTracking is enabled, but version or changelogItem is not found in output.
```

️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]

⚠️Warning [Logs] Generate from 281e0091410ced102f2890f3b34ef57276749390. Schema Automation 14.0.0

command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
cmderr	[initScript.sh] old lockfile
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm,
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry.
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient...
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json

️✔️azuresiterecovery [View full logs] [Preview Schema Changes]

️❌ azure-powershell failed [Detail]

❌Pipeline Framework Failed [Logs] Generate from 281e0091410ced102f2890f3b34ef57276749390. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
SSL error: syscall failure: Broken pipe
Error: SSL error: syscall failure: Broken pipe

️✔️Az.azuresiterecovery.DefaultTag [View full logs]

error	Fatal error: SSL error: syscall failure: Broken pipe
error	The following packages are still pending:
error		Az.azuresiterecovery.DefaultTag

_{Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?}

openapi-pipeline-app · 2023-07-19T23:36:07Z

Generated ApiView

Language	Package Name	ApiView Link
Swagger	Microsoft.DataReplication	https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/324db1b792424a81bb84208b54e03626
Go	sdk/resourcemanager/azuresiterecovery/armazuresiterecovery	https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/2e02777bde754ab1ac32a3d1cc10c9ca
Java	azure-resourcemanager-azuresiterecovery	https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/055dc55650a14e2eb90e0f1437c7993a
JavaScript	@azure/arm-azuresiterecovery	Create ApiView failed. Please ask PR assignee for help

openapi-workflow-bot · 2023-07-19T23:41:35Z

Hi @minhsuanlee This PR was flagged for introducing a new RP namespace that is not being onboarded with RPaaS. Merging this PR to the main branch will be blocked as RPaaS is required for new RPs. To resolve this and allow the PR to be merged into the main branch, please use RPaaS to onboard the new RP.

openapi-workflow-bot · 2023-07-19T23:41:36Z

Hi, @minhsuanlee, our workflow has detected that there is no management SDK ever released for your RP, to further process SDK onboard for your RP, you should have the SDK client library name of your RP reviewed and approved.
Action Required:

Follow this guidance Naming for new initial management or client libraries (new SDKs) - Overview (azure.com) to create an issue for management client library name arch board review.

Paste the issue link that you created in step 1 in this PR

Impact: SDK release owner will take the approved management client library name to release SDK. No client library name approval will leads to SDK release delayed.

minhsuanlee · 2023-07-20T01:18:18Z

he issue link that you created in step 1 in this PR

Link to New RP Namespace Issue: https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-pr/issues/1220

konrad-jamrozik · 2023-07-20T18:21:22Z

@rkmanda I assigned you as @minhsuanlee was asking me for help with LintDiff failures. I also added WaitForARMFeedback to put this PR on your review queue.

openapi-workflow-bot · 2023-07-21T20:39:08Z

Hi @minhsuanlee! Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI issues, if present, in following order: Avocado, SemanticValidation, ModelValidation, Breaking Change, LintDiff.

Task	How to fix	Priority
Avocado	Fix-Avocado	High
Semantic Validation	Fix-SemanticValidation-Error	High
Model Validation	Fix-ModelValidation-Error	High
LintDiff	Fix-LintDiff	High

If you need further help, please reach out on the Teams channel aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel.

minhsuanlee · 2023-07-24T21:35:14Z

For LintDiff errors LroErrorContent and OperationsApiResponseSchema, I have taken necessary steps to locally reproduce the errors but from what I can tell, the cause of the error does not seem to be valid as our schema is already following the guidelines. I even tried copy-paste the schema from types.json to our swagger directly and re-run Lint validation, it still failed.

mayada83

Looks good.

konrad-jamrozik · 2023-07-24T23:30:27Z

@mayada83 if you confirm the Swagger LintDiff check failure is incorrect, please add the Approved-LintDiff label. If you approve this PR on behalf of the ARM team, please add the ARMSignedOff label. Thank you!

minhsuanlee · 2023-07-25T21:15:41Z

Moving to a new PR [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.DataReplication to add version preview/2021-02-16-preview #24974 as Service Name has been updated from 'azuresiterecovery' to 'recoveryservicesdatareplication'

visingla-ms · 2023-07-26T22:40:57Z

{

Observed that your new RP is not RPaaS based RP. Non-RPaaS RPs are not allowed, unless you have got an exception. If that's the case, please forward me the RPaaS exception email/communication for your RP.

Refers to: specification/azuresiterecovery/resource-manager/Microsoft.DataReplication/preview/2021-02-16-preview/azuresiterecovery.json:1 in 5ef4eea. [](commit_id = 5ef4eea, deletion_comment = False)

openapi-workflow-bot · 2023-07-26T22:41:29Z

Please address or respond to feedback from the ARM API reviewer.
When you are ready to continue the ARM API review, please remove the ARMChangesRequested label.
This will notify the reviewer to have another look.
If the feedback provided needs further discussion, please use this Teams channel to post your questions - aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel.
Please include [ARM Query] in the title of your question to indicate that it is ARM-related.

microsoft-github-policy-service · 2023-08-14T01:35:34Z

Hi, @minhsuanlee. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

minhsuanlee and others added 2 commits July 19, 2023 16:29

Generate new Service for azuresiterecovery

61df459

Init swagger review

5ef4eea

azure-sdk mentioned this pull request Jul 19, 2023

[AutoPR azuresiterecovery] [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.DataReplication to add version preview/2021-02-16-preview azure-sdk/azure-resource-manager-schemas#2922

Draft

AzureRestAPISpecReview added CI-NewRPNamespaceWithoutRPaaS new-api-version new-rp-namespace resource-manager labels Jul 19, 2023

konrad-jamrozik assigned rkmanda Jul 20, 2023

konrad-jamrozik added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Jul 20, 2023

minhsuanlee marked this pull request as ready for review July 21, 2023 20:33

minhsuanlee requested review from jsntcy, msyyc, qiaozha and tadelesh as code owners July 21, 2023 20:33

AzureRestAPISpecReview added ARMReview CI-FixRequiredOnFailure labels Jul 21, 2023

mayada83 approved these changes Jul 24, 2023

View reviewed changes

visingla-ms added the ARMChangesRequested label Jul 26, 2023

openapi-workflow-bot Bot removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Jul 26, 2023

visingla-ms mentioned this pull request Jul 27, 2023

[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.DataReplication to add version preview/2021-02-16-preview #24974

Merged

8 tasks

microsoft-github-policy-service Bot added the no-recent-activity label Aug 14, 2023

minhsuanlee closed this Aug 18, 2023

Conversation

minhsuanlee commented Jul 19, 2023 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

ARM (Control Plane) API Specification Update Pull Request

PR review workflow diagram

Purpose of this PR

Due diligence checklist

ARM API changes review

Breaking change review

Getting help

Uh oh!

openapi-workflow-bot Bot commented Jul 19, 2023

Uh oh!

openapi-pipeline-app Bot commented Jul 19, 2023 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Swagger Validation Report

Uh oh!

openapi-pipeline-app Bot commented Jul 19, 2023 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Swagger Generation Artifacts

Breaking Changes Tracking

Uh oh!

openapi-pipeline-app Bot commented Jul 19, 2023 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Generated ApiView

Uh oh!

openapi-workflow-bot Bot commented Jul 19, 2023

Uh oh!

openapi-workflow-bot Bot commented Jul 19, 2023

Uh oh!

minhsuanlee commented Jul 20, 2023

Uh oh!

konrad-jamrozik commented Jul 20, 2023 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openapi-workflow-bot Bot commented Jul 21, 2023

Uh oh!

minhsuanlee commented Jul 24, 2023

Uh oh!

mayada83 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

konrad-jamrozik commented Jul 24, 2023 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

minhsuanlee commented Jul 25, 2023

Uh oh!

visingla-ms commented Jul 26, 2023

Uh oh!

openapi-workflow-bot Bot commented Jul 26, 2023

Uh oh!

microsoft-github-policy-service Bot commented Aug 14, 2023

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

6 participants

minhsuanlee commented Jul 19, 2023 •

edited

Loading

openapi-pipeline-app Bot commented Jul 19, 2023 •

edited

Loading

openapi-pipeline-app Bot commented Jul 19, 2023 •

edited

Loading

openapi-pipeline-app Bot commented Jul 19, 2023 •

edited

Loading

konrad-jamrozik commented Jul 20, 2023 •

edited

Loading

konrad-jamrozik commented Jul 24, 2023 •

edited

Loading