[AZURE] Microsoft.AzureStack namespace specs

[deathly809]

This checklist is used to make sure that common issues in a pull request are addressed. This will expedite the process of getting your pull request merged and avoid extra work on your part to fix issues discovered during the review process.

PR information

• The title of the PR is clear and informative.
• There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For information on cleaning up the commits in your pull request, see this page.
• Except for special cases involving multiple contributors, the PR is started from a fork of the main repository, not a branch.
• If applicable, the PR references the bug/issue that it fixes.
• Swagger files are correctly named (e.g. the api-version in the path should match the api-version in the spec).

Quality of Swagger

• I have read the contribution guidelines.
• My spec meets the review criteria:
  • The spec conforms to the Swagger 2.0 specification.
  • The spec follows the guidelines described in the Swagger checklist document.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.

[AutorestCI]

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-python

[AutorestCI]

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

Encountered a Subprocess error: (azure-sdk-for-go)

Command: dep ensure
Finished with return code 127
and output:

/bin/sh: 1: dep: not found

[azuresdkciprbot]

Hi There,

I am the AutoRest Linter Azure bot. I am here to help. My task is to analyze the situation from the AutoRest linter perspective. Please review the below analysis result:

File: specification/azurestack/resource-manager/readme.md
Before the PR: Warning(s): 0 Error(s): 0
After the PR: Warning(s): 0 Error(s): 0

AutoRest Linter Guidelines | AutoRest Linter Issues | Send feedback

Thanks for your co-operation.

[azuresdkciprbot]

Hi There,

I am the AutoRest Linter Azure bot. I am here to help. My task is to analyze the situation from the AutoRest linter perspective. Please review the below analysis result:

💡 Please review potentially introduced Error(s)/Warning(s): Analysis Report 💡

File: specification/azurestack/resource-manager/readme.md
Before the PR: Warning(s): 0 Error(s): 0
After the PR: Warning(s): 0 Error(s): 5

AutoRest Linter Guidelines | AutoRest Linter Issues | Send feedback

Thanks for your co-operation.

[jianghaolu]

All the negative response status code descriptions MUST be defined in the description of the "default" status code (if the intention is for documentation purpose only). Example: "description": "'404' - 'Not found'.\n'400' - 'Bad request'.\n'500': 'Internal Server Error'."'

[deathly809]

This is not for documentation. This is so we don't throw an exception and instead return a null object. Is that okay? Please let me know if I understood correctly.

[jianghaolu]

Sounds good to me.

[jianghaolu]

Same here and elsewhere.

[deathly809]

See above.

[deathly809]

@jianghaolu I have responded to your requests.

[deathly809]

@jianghaolu Please merge.

[ravbhatnagar]

Looks good!