Skip to content

Comments

Minor Fixes for TrafficController 2022-10-01-preview#22888

Merged
allenjzhang merged 4 commits intomainfrom
shmalpani/tc-fix
Mar 3, 2023
Merged

Minor Fixes for TrafficController 2022-10-01-preview#22888
allenjzhang merged 4 commits intomainfrom
shmalpani/tc-fix

Conversation

@malpaniHMC
Copy link
Contributor

@malpaniHMC malpaniHMC commented Mar 3, 2023

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @malpaniHMC Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vscswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Mar 3, 2023

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️❌BreakingChange: 17 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
    compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.4)] new version base version
    TrafficController.json 2022-10-01-preview(4ff04ab) 2022-10-01-preview(main)
    Rule Message
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L185:9
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L185:9
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L225:9
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L225:9
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L291:9
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L291:9
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L340:9
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L340:9
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L399:9
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L399:9
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L444:9
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L444:9
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L487:9
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L487:9
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L556:9
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L556:9
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L608:9
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L608:9
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L670:9
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L670:9
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L715:9
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L715:9
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L758:9
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L758:9
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L827:9
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L827:9
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L879:9
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L879:9
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L1316:5
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L1316:5
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L1325:5
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L1325:5
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L1334:5
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L1334:5
    ️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
    compared tags (via openapi-validator v2.0.0) new version base version
    package-2022-10-01-preview package-2022-10-01-preview(4ff04ab) package-2022-10-01-preview(main)

    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Rule Message
    ⚠️ SchemaDescriptionOrTitle Schema should have a description or title.
    Location: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L1008
    ⚠️ AvoidNestedProperties Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience
    Location: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L1029
    ⚠️ SchemaDescriptionOrTitle Schema should have a description or title.
    Location: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L1069
    ⚠️ SchemaDescriptionOrTitle Schema should have a description or title.
    Location: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L1102
    ⚠️ AvoidNestedProperties Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience
    Location: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L1159
    ⚠️ SchemaDescriptionOrTitle Schema should have a description or title.
    Location: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L1183
    ⚠️ AvoidNestedProperties Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience
    Location: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2022-10-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L1303
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️⚠️~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]

    API Test is not triggered due to precheck failure. Check pipeline log for details.

    ️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️❌CadlAPIView: 0 Errors, 1 Warnings failed [Detail]
    Rule Message
    ⚠️ Failed to generate cadl APIView. Please check the detail log and make sure cadl compiler version is the latest. "How to fix":"Check the detailed log and update cadl version to latest."
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passed for PoliCheck.
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    ️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for CadlValidation.
    ️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Summary.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Mar 3, 2023

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    ️️✔️SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Breaking Changes Tracking



    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 3a2c320. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice New minor version of npm available! 9.3.1 -> 9.6.0
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v9.6.0>
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g npm@9.6.0` to update!
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice
    • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-servicenetworking [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog]
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 3a2c320. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/servicenetworking/armservicenetworking [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] ### Other Changes
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 0 additive change(s).
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Mar 3, 2023

    Generated ApiView

    Language Package Name ApiView Link
    Go sdk/resourcemanager/servicenetworking/armservicenetworking https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/6d79d45ef45743b0ba4fada7840e3a11

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @malpaniHMC, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
    Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
    If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
    If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback.
    Note: To avoid breaking change, you can refer to Shift Left Solution for detecting breaking change in early phase at your service code repository.

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @malpaniHMC, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff. If you have any questions, please post your questions in this channel https://aka.ms/swaggersupport.

    TaskHow to fixPriority
    AvocadoFix-AvocadoHigh
    Semantic validationFix-SemanticValidation-ErrorHigh
    Model validationFix-ModelValidation-ErrorHigh
    LintDiffFix-LintDiffhigh
    If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback.

    "type": "string",
    "enum": [
    "subnets"
    "Subnet"
    Copy link

    @alxyzc alxyzc Mar 3, 2023

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    I thought we agreed to use the plural "Subnets" for AssociationType? NFVRP is already serializing this enum as plural.

    @allenjzhang
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Breaking change due to enum value changes. RP is first release and in private preview. Breaking change signed off.

    @allenjzhang allenjzhang added the Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 label Mar 3, 2023
    Copy link
    Contributor

    @allenjzhang allenjzhang left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Please check in the corresponding updated cadl file.

    "type": "string",
    "enum": [
    "public"
    "Public"
    Copy link

    @alxyzc alxyzc Mar 3, 2023

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Is this change going into a new API version? Right now NFVRP serializes this enum with "camelCase" for all versions. The code is setup so that for future API versions we could serialize with "PascalCase". But if we change the casing in-place, some SDKs might be broken again.

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️🔄ApiDocPreview inProgress [Detail]
    ️⌛SDK Breaking Change Tracking pending [Detail]
    ️⌛ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 pending [Detail]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @allenjzhang allenjzhang merged commit 3a2c320 into main Mar 3, 2023
    @allenjzhang allenjzhang deleted the shmalpani/tc-fix branch March 3, 2023 04:58
    aviyerMSFT pushed a commit to aviyerMSFT/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2023
    * regex changes
    
    * enum errors
    
    * reverting enum changes, uupdating cadl, updating regex
    
    * reverting example enum changes
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Labels

    Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 BreakingChangeReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when breaking change review is required Cadl Authored with Cadl FixS360 resource-manager

    Projects

    None yet

    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    5 participants