-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
add multidimentional RCA API #16924
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add multidimentional RCA API #16924
Conversation
|
Hi, @suxi-ms Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected] |
|
[Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks. |
Swagger Validation Report
|
| Rule | Message |
|---|---|
| 200/201 Responses of long running operations must have a schema definition for return type. OperationId: 'UploadMultiDimRCAData', Response code: '201' Location: AnomalyDetector/preview/v2.0-preview/MultidimensionalRootCauseAnalysis.json#L219 |
|
| Guid used in model definition 'MultiDimRCADataSetDetail' for property 'dataSetId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: AnomalyDetector/preview/v2.0-preview/MultidimensionalRootCauseAnalysis.json#L1001 |
|
| Guid used in model definition 'MultiDimRCATargetMeasure' for property 'dataSetId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: AnomalyDetector/preview/v2.0-preview/MultidimensionalRootCauseAnalysis.json#L1494 |
|
| Guid used in model definition 'MultiDimRCADataScope' for property 'dataSetId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: AnomalyDetector/preview/v2.0-preview/MultidimensionalRootCauseAnalysis.json#L1512 |
|
| Guid used in model definition 'MultiDimRCAInstanceResponse' for property 'instanceId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: AnomalyDetector/preview/v2.0-preview/MultidimensionalRootCauseAnalysis.json#L1575 |
|
| Guid used in model definition 'MultiDimRCATrainingResponse' for property 'taskId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: AnomalyDetector/preview/v2.0-preview/MultidimensionalRootCauseAnalysis.json#L1741 |
|
| Guid used in model definition 'MultiDimRootCauseMeasure' for property 'dataSetId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: AnomalyDetector/preview/v2.0-preview/MultidimensionalRootCauseAnalysis.json#L1863 |
|
| Guid used in model definition 'MultiDimRCAInferenceResponse' for property 'inferenceId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: AnomalyDetector/preview/v2.0-preview/MultidimensionalRootCauseAnalysis.json#L1947 |
The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
| Rule | Message |
|---|---|
| Guid used in model definition 'Model' for property 'modelId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: AnomalyDetector/preview/v2.0-preview/MultivariateAnomalyDetector.json#L353 |
|
| Guid used in model definition 'ModelSnapshot' for property 'modelId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: AnomalyDetector/preview/v2.0-preview/MultivariateAnomalyDetector.json#L724 |
|
| Guid used in model definition 'DetectionResult' for property 'resultId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: AnomalyDetector/preview/v2.0-preview/MultivariateAnomalyDetector.json#L826 |
️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️~[Staging] ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️Cross-Version Breaking Changes succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
- Compared Swaggers (Based on Oad v0.9.1)
- current:preview/v2.0-preview/AnomalyDetector.json compared with base:stable/v1.0/AnomalyDetector.json
- current:preview/v2.0-preview/AnomalyDetector.json compared with base:preview/v1.1-preview/AnomalyDetector.json
- current:preview/v2.0-preview/MultivariateAnomalyDetector.json compared with base:preview/v1.1-preview/MultivariateAnomalyDetector.json
️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️️✔️SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SDKTrack2Validation
- The following tags are being changed in this PR
️❌PrettierCheck: 1 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
| Rule | Message |
|---|---|
HowToFix |
Code style issues found path: AnomalyDetector/preview/v2.0-preview/MultidimensionalRootCauseAnalysis.json |
️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
|
Hi @suxi-ms, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of
|
|
Have these APIs been reviewed by the API review board? |
Not yet. We are scheduling the review time with review board. |
mikekistler
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I made a quick pass and found a few issues.
| "type": "string" | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All success responses except 202 & 204 should define a response body.
| "@nextLink": { | ||
| "description": "Link of next page, only provided when there are next pages", | ||
| "type": "string", | ||
| "readOnly": true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is no need to define nextLink as readOnly: true as this schema is only used in a response.
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "in": "query", | ||
| "name": "$skip", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
DO NOT use the "$" prefix on OData query parameter names -- the Azure standard is to drop the "$".
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "in": "query", | ||
| "name": "$maxpagesize", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't use "$" in query parameter names.
| ], | ||
| "type": "object", | ||
| "properties": { | ||
| "@nextLink": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't use the "@" in the name of the nextLink property of pageable responses.
| "description": "create a multidimensional root cause analysis data set request", | ||
| "schema": { | ||
| "$ref": "#/definitions/CreateMultiDimRCADatasetRequest" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this body parameter be marked as required? The body schema has required fields so it seems unlikely that the entire body is optional.
| "description": "Data to be uploaded to perform multidimensional root cause analysis", | ||
| "schema": { | ||
| "$ref": "#/definitions/MultiDimRCAUploadDataRequest" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should body parameter be required?
| "description": "Create a multidimensional RCA instance request", | ||
| "schema": { | ||
| "$ref": "#/definitions/MultiDimRCAInstanceRequest" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should body parameter be required?
| "schema": { | ||
| "$ref": "#/definitions/MultiDimRCATrainingRequest" | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should body parameter be required?
| "description": "Inference request of multidimensional RCA", | ||
| "schema": { | ||
| "$ref": "#/definitions/MultiDimRCAInferenceRequest" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should body parameter be required?
|
Hi, @suxi-ms. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove |
|
Hi, @suxi-ms. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove |
|
Hi, @suxi-ms. The PR will be closed since the PR has no update for 28 days. If you still need the PR review to proceed, please reopen it and @ mention PR assignee. |
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Changelog
Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:
Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that label "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added automatically to begin ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays to the manifest.
-[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits.
Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.